男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Europe

Nurturing fair and efficient reform

By Huang Jikun | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2017-04-21 09:05
Share
Share - WeChat

Strategy of not too big and not too small is the proper way forward for Chinese agriculture

Chinese land reform policy aims to achieve two goals simultaneously - equity and efficiency. Unlike radical land privatization, the core policy in China is to combine collective "ownership" of land, overseen by local village committees, with land use contracts held by individual households. Villagers can lease their lands to more efficient farms while still protecting their contract rights to the land.

For many farm households, even those who have migrated for work in cities, the family plot serves as an ultimate safety net. China now has more than 230 million rural households that hold contract rights to their plots.

Given the unequal land distribution and its social consequences during more than 2,000 years of feudal society in China, the country's leaders believe that private land ownership does not necessarily enrich farmers. Before 1949, a large population of poor, landless peasants was dominated by a small class of landlords. No one wants to risk going back to that.

In some countries, such as India or the Philippines, private land ownership has resulted in slums of unemployed people in the cities and poor farm workers or sharecroppers in the countryside. In some places, society remains almost feudal. Though large farms exist in those countries, they are not always efficient.

Beginning with the breakup of collective farms that started in 1978, the household responsibility system raised agricultural productivity and ensured adequate food supplies for China. Together with an equitable distribution of land, this resulted in a massive reduction in rural poverty in the early reform period. The average annual growth rate of China's agricultural production reached 4.5 percent during the period of 1980-2015, which was more than four times its population growth rate over the same period.

China has made a series of legal and policy efforts to ensure the security of land contract rights for farmers. In 1998, the land contract period was extended to 30 years. Laws issued in the early 2000s prohibited land re-allocation for almost all reasons. In recent years, there have been frequent announcements that land contract rights will not be changed in the long run, implying that plots can be inherited.

The most recent effort involves registering and certifying farmland for each rural household. In conjunction with newly widespread town or county-level land transfer service centers, this has allowed more market-based leasing, not just the earlier transfers among relatives and friends.

Average farm size has been declining in almost every Asian country. China, with an average farm size of less than 1 hectare and nearly 40 percent of the world's small farms, also saw farm sizes falling until the early 2000s. But, for the past 10 to 15 years, China has been using market processes combined with policy support and its unique leasing institutions to move toward larger farms.

The rapid emergence of middle (a few hectares) and large (tens and hundreds of hectares) operational units in many regions of China is striking. By the end of 2013, nearly 53 million, or 23 percent, of rural households had rented out their cultivated land. In the grain growing regions of northern and northeastern China, average farm size increased from 1.03 hectares in 2008 to 1.73 in 2013, a rise of nearly 70 percent in five years. All indicators are that the process has accelerated in recent years.

Policy support for the larger farms includes subsidies for loans, investment or purchases of machinery and insurance. Machinery cooperatives and companies that sell their services across wide areas have become ubiquitous since 2008.

Data shows that excessively large farms may also not be efficient in China. Having farms of appropriate sizes operated by households might be the best path of farm operational evolution. Policy should support the small farms that plan to move to somewhat larger and more productive sizes, not the excessively large plantation farms seen in some other densely populated countries.

The author is a professor and director of the China Center for Agricultural Policy at Peking University.

(China Daily European Weekly 04/21/2017 page9)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 鹤岗市| 文山县| 顺义区| 新晃| 阜南县| 梅河口市| 漠河县| 滨海县| 洛宁县| 康乐县| 浮山县| 宜黄县| 兖州市| 井研县| 紫阳县| 延庆县| 长沙市| 霞浦县| 永济市| 河间市| 黔西县| 玉树县| 大城县| 阳东县| 叶城县| 东台市| 新乡县| 阳春市| 乐都县| 鄯善县| 博客| 临洮县| 理塘县| 三明市| 怀安县| 和政县| 克东县| 威宁| 吉木萨尔县| 凤山市| 元谋县| 娄底市| 图木舒克市| 磐安县| 榕江县| 台东县| 周至县| 凯里市| 陇南市| 全南县| 抚宁县| 泽库县| 肥乡县| 柳州市| 天水市| 红河县| 屏东市| 图们市| 丹凤县| 石河子市| 镇江市| 灵璧县| 溧阳市| 华池县| 绿春县| 墨脱县| 高淳县| 隆德县| 齐河县| 吉水县| 寻甸| 萍乡市| 肃南| 洮南市| 余江县| 陆川县| 萨嘎县| 威信县| 根河市| 什邡市| 额敏县| 滨州市|