男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

Reality proves naysayers wrong

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-05-05 09:11
Share
Share - WeChat

Former Hong Kong governor Chris Patten and the special administrative region's opposition figures Martin Lee Chu-ming, Joshua Wong Chi-fung and Lam Wing-kee gave "testimonies" on Wednesday at a hearing of the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China in relation to the status quo of "One Country, Two Systems" on the eve of the SAR's 20th anniversary. The foursome's conclusion was that "One Country, Two Systems" had drastically degenerated, and the US must put pressure on Beijing to "safeguard Hong Kong people's political freedom".

The commission is an agency which has regularly interfered in China's domestic affairs in the name of upholding the principles of human rights and democracy. Any fair-minded person can see the commission does not have any right whatsoever to comment on the implementation of the "One Country, Two Systems" principle in Hong Kong or how democracy has progressed in the city. That is absolutely the internal affair of China.

If the US really wishes "One Country, Two Systems" well - which it doesn't (and which is none of its business anyway) - it is ironic that those the US invited to the hearing were the very people who have done serious harm to this innovative and pragmatic arrangement.

Patten, while serving as the last governor of Hong Kong, breached the previous agreements between Beijing and London and introduced a series of "reforms" that consequently disrupted the smooth political transition to the first SAR government. Lee led the opposition camp into a staunch anti-mainland stance and kept inviting foreign intervention in our internal affairs. Wong has tried to stir up the young generation against Beijing and has apparently become "Martin Lee 2.0" with the support of foreign forces pulling strings behind the scenes. Lam overstepped the fine line between the "Two Systems" by selling illegal books into the mainland.

These people represent the forces in Hong Kong and beyond that want "One Country, Two Systems" to fail.

To their disappointment and contrary to their allegations, "One Country, Two Systems" has been doing just great. Under the protection of this arrangement and the Basic Law, the city has been able to preserve its social and economic fabric and original way of life in the past two decades. Hong Kong people have enjoyed unparalleled levels of freedom, democracy and human rights not known in colonial days.

The practice of "One Country, Two Systems" in Hong Kong is certainly not perfect but there are myriads of channels and platforms - official and unofficial - through which suggestions for improvement could be heard here. Bad-mouthing the SAR and central governments in front of foreign audiences with an unfriendly agenda will do only harm and no good to us. Inviting foreign forces to intervene is just ridiculous.

(HK Edition 05/05/2017 page1)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 汉阴县| 甘孜| 尼勒克县| 娄底市| 南通市| 镇康县| 长葛市| 勃利县| 手机| 江油市| 淮滨县| 旅游| 长垣县| 阳原县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 河津市| 中方县| 南雄市| 石嘴山市| 临桂县| 拜城县| 墨脱县| 甘谷县| 合水县| 龙南县| 娱乐| 蓬安县| 武强县| 柳江县| 会泽县| 城步| 葵青区| 莆田市| 东至县| 黑水县| 耒阳市| 邵阳县| 射阳县| 阳曲县| 墨竹工卡县| 巨鹿县| 丰都县| 凤阳县| 宝鸡市| 长阳| 桂平市| 玉林市| 海原县| 定结县| 崇仁县| 罗源县| 大宁县| 华亭县| 嘉义县| 东平县| 太仆寺旗| 金秀| 兴城市| 平安县| 锦州市| 且末县| 宝兴县| 温泉县| 苏州市| 湖州市| 兴山县| 广安市| 大悟县| 元朗区| 丘北县| 晋江市| 维西| 兴仁县| 泰宁县| 乌恰县| 封开县| 永济市| 洪雅县| 马龙县| 金塔县| 塔城市| 南溪县|