男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

Reality proves naysayers wrong

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-05-05 09:11
Share
Share - WeChat

Former Hong Kong governor Chris Patten and the special administrative region's opposition figures Martin Lee Chu-ming, Joshua Wong Chi-fung and Lam Wing-kee gave "testimonies" on Wednesday at a hearing of the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China in relation to the status quo of "One Country, Two Systems" on the eve of the SAR's 20th anniversary. The foursome's conclusion was that "One Country, Two Systems" had drastically degenerated, and the US must put pressure on Beijing to "safeguard Hong Kong people's political freedom".

The commission is an agency which has regularly interfered in China's domestic affairs in the name of upholding the principles of human rights and democracy. Any fair-minded person can see the commission does not have any right whatsoever to comment on the implementation of the "One Country, Two Systems" principle in Hong Kong or how democracy has progressed in the city. That is absolutely the internal affair of China.

If the US really wishes "One Country, Two Systems" well - which it doesn't (and which is none of its business anyway) - it is ironic that those the US invited to the hearing were the very people who have done serious harm to this innovative and pragmatic arrangement.

Patten, while serving as the last governor of Hong Kong, breached the previous agreements between Beijing and London and introduced a series of "reforms" that consequently disrupted the smooth political transition to the first SAR government. Lee led the opposition camp into a staunch anti-mainland stance and kept inviting foreign intervention in our internal affairs. Wong has tried to stir up the young generation against Beijing and has apparently become "Martin Lee 2.0" with the support of foreign forces pulling strings behind the scenes. Lam overstepped the fine line between the "Two Systems" by selling illegal books into the mainland.

These people represent the forces in Hong Kong and beyond that want "One Country, Two Systems" to fail.

To their disappointment and contrary to their allegations, "One Country, Two Systems" has been doing just great. Under the protection of this arrangement and the Basic Law, the city has been able to preserve its social and economic fabric and original way of life in the past two decades. Hong Kong people have enjoyed unparalleled levels of freedom, democracy and human rights not known in colonial days.

The practice of "One Country, Two Systems" in Hong Kong is certainly not perfect but there are myriads of channels and platforms - official and unofficial - through which suggestions for improvement could be heard here. Bad-mouthing the SAR and central governments in front of foreign audiences with an unfriendly agenda will do only harm and no good to us. Inviting foreign forces to intervene is just ridiculous.

(HK Edition 05/05/2017 page1)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 横山县| 濮阳县| 昂仁县| 自治县| 翼城县| 南郑县| 普陀区| 卢湾区| 会理县| 泰兴市| 昌乐县| 抚顺县| 曲阜市| 饶平县| 栖霞市| 左云县| 长泰县| 吉水县| 哈尔滨市| 秦皇岛市| 广灵县| 广饶县| 万山特区| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 双城市| 禄丰县| 阿图什市| 德清县| 苍山县| 饶阳县| 板桥市| 方正县| 乌鲁木齐县| 德江县| 荃湾区| 进贤县| 阿尔山市| 视频| 玉屏| 葫芦岛市| 平阴县| 通辽市| 新蔡县| 平利县| 富平县| 姜堰市| 腾冲县| 衡山县| 兴山县| 金山区| 微山县| 吉林省| 夏津县| 潍坊市| 富阳市| 东阿县| 崇仁县| 罗源县| 忻州市| 大邑县| 寿光市| 文水县| 正安县| 刚察县| 吴旗县| 大余县| 怀安县| 涟水县| 玉环县| 黎城县| 清远市| 兰州市| 高邑县| 临夏市| 伊宁市| 彩票| 道孚县| 泰兴市| 高邮市| 永春县| 登封市| 左云县|