男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Questions abound after train derailment

By LINDA DENG in Seattle | China Daily USA | Updated: 2017-12-20 23:37
Share
Share - WeChat

A Washington state politician is questioning whether Amtrak had sufficient safety measures in place before Monday's catastrophic derailment.

"It's going to call into question the overall safety culture that Amtrak may be lacking," Washington House of Representatives member Dick Muri told China Daily.

An Amtrak 501 Cascade train, with 78 passengers and five crew members, derailed on an overpass early Monday on Interstate Highway 5 in Pierce County, Washington, with some of its 14 cars crumpling and plunging onto the highway.

Three people died in the crash and more than 70 were injured. As of Tuesday, 35 people were still hospitalized, including 21 in critical or serious condition.

Several people also were injured on the highway, though no fatalities were reported on the major roadway.

"The train cars will be removed (from the highway) by the end of the day," said Mike Courts, mayor of DuPont, the small town in which the train derailed. He said they were aiming to clear the highway before a snowfall.

"Whether it (Amtrak) makes sure that trains run on the right time, the right speed, at the right place … something that could be possibly controlled," said Muri, a Republican who represents the 28th District. "We have been questioning for the last couple of years, many years, about the whole idea of high-speed train coming to our land here. … This is way above our level. It is a federal issue when you talk about train safety."

Investigators also are looking into whether the train's engineer was distracted by the presence of an employee-in-training next to him in the locomotive, a federal official said Tuesday.

The official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said investigators want to know whether the engineer lost "situational awareness" because of the second person in the cab.

Preliminary information also indicated that the emergency brake went off and was not manually activated by the engineer, National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) member Bella Dinh-Zarr said.

The train was making the inaugural run along a fast bypass route that was created by refurbishing freight tracks alongside I-5. The 15-mile, $180.7-million project was aimed at speeding up service by bypassing a route with a number of curves, single-track tunnels and freight traffic.

At a meeting on Dec 4 in Lakewood, Washington, southwest of Tacoma, Mayor Don Anderson said it was only a matter of time before the Amtrak train would be involved in a deadly accident.

"It's virtually inevitable that someone is going to get killed that wouldn't be killed otherwise," Anderson said then. "This is unacceptable."

The city of Lakewood sued the Washington state Department of Transportation in 2013, looking to stop the project, arguing it did not have a sufficient environmental review, The Seattle Times reported. The city lost partly because the law prevents cities and towns from regulating rail lines.

The train was clocked at 81.1 mph moments before the derailment, according to transitdocs.com, a website that maps Amtrak train locations and speeds using data from the railroad's train tracker app.

Dinh-Zarr confirmed on Monday that the data recorder in the train's showed it was train was traveling at about three times the speed limit (30 mph) when it derailed. She said it was too early to determine why the train was going so fast.

Amtrak's co-chief executive, Richard Anderson, acknowledged that a working Positive Train Control (PTC) system, which slows trains if they are going too fast, had not been installed on that stretch.

Associated Press contributed to this story.

lindadeng@chinadailyusa.com

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 比如县| 左云县| 长白| 航空| 岳阳县| 呼图壁县| 老河口市| 永吉县| 宁津县| 台中市| 黑山县| 尤溪县| 浮梁县| 扶余县| 延庆县| 延川县| 宜兰市| 南宁市| 潞西市| 望江县| 忻州市| 新宁县| 五家渠市| 靖安县| 香格里拉县| 巢湖市| 镇康县| 湘西| 青龙| 张家界市| 玉环县| 云霄县| 阿荣旗| 长岭县| 高邑县| 千阳县| 旬阳县| 丹棱县| 吴川市| 资源县| 磐安县| 武清区| 远安县| 石景山区| 泾阳县| 涞源县| 民权县| 永靖县| 扶余县| 乐业县| 金川县| 高台县| 东台市| 增城市| 三原县| 清水县| 武宣县| 留坝县| 白朗县| 黄冈市| 东丰县| 五峰| 垫江县| 北海市| 逊克县| 乐都县| 台前县| 兴城市| 加查县| 将乐县| 青铜峡市| 大悟县| 嘉义县| 丹江口市| 读书| 休宁县| 内黄县| 呼图壁县| 新竹县| 宁蒗| 永靖县| 墨竹工卡县|