男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Questions abound after train derailment

By LINDA DENG in Seattle | China Daily USA | Updated: 2017-12-20 23:37
Share
Share - WeChat

A Washington state politician is questioning whether Amtrak had sufficient safety measures in place before Monday's catastrophic derailment.

"It's going to call into question the overall safety culture that Amtrak may be lacking," Washington House of Representatives member Dick Muri told China Daily.

An Amtrak 501 Cascade train, with 78 passengers and five crew members, derailed on an overpass early Monday on Interstate Highway 5 in Pierce County, Washington, with some of its 14 cars crumpling and plunging onto the highway.

Three people died in the crash and more than 70 were injured. As of Tuesday, 35 people were still hospitalized, including 21 in critical or serious condition.

Several people also were injured on the highway, though no fatalities were reported on the major roadway.

"The train cars will be removed (from the highway) by the end of the day," said Mike Courts, mayor of DuPont, the small town in which the train derailed. He said they were aiming to clear the highway before a snowfall.

"Whether it (Amtrak) makes sure that trains run on the right time, the right speed, at the right place … something that could be possibly controlled," said Muri, a Republican who represents the 28th District. "We have been questioning for the last couple of years, many years, about the whole idea of high-speed train coming to our land here. … This is way above our level. It is a federal issue when you talk about train safety."

Investigators also are looking into whether the train's engineer was distracted by the presence of an employee-in-training next to him in the locomotive, a federal official said Tuesday.

The official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said investigators want to know whether the engineer lost "situational awareness" because of the second person in the cab.

Preliminary information also indicated that the emergency brake went off and was not manually activated by the engineer, National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) member Bella Dinh-Zarr said.

The train was making the inaugural run along a fast bypass route that was created by refurbishing freight tracks alongside I-5. The 15-mile, $180.7-million project was aimed at speeding up service by bypassing a route with a number of curves, single-track tunnels and freight traffic.

At a meeting on Dec 4 in Lakewood, Washington, southwest of Tacoma, Mayor Don Anderson said it was only a matter of time before the Amtrak train would be involved in a deadly accident.

"It's virtually inevitable that someone is going to get killed that wouldn't be killed otherwise," Anderson said then. "This is unacceptable."

The city of Lakewood sued the Washington state Department of Transportation in 2013, looking to stop the project, arguing it did not have a sufficient environmental review, The Seattle Times reported. The city lost partly because the law prevents cities and towns from regulating rail lines.

The train was clocked at 81.1 mph moments before the derailment, according to transitdocs.com, a website that maps Amtrak train locations and speeds using data from the railroad's train tracker app.

Dinh-Zarr confirmed on Monday that the data recorder in the train's showed it was train was traveling at about three times the speed limit (30 mph) when it derailed. She said it was too early to determine why the train was going so fast.

Amtrak's co-chief executive, Richard Anderson, acknowledged that a working Positive Train Control (PTC) system, which slows trains if they are going too fast, had not been installed on that stretch.

Associated Press contributed to this story.

lindadeng@chinadailyusa.com

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 新野县| 嘉定区| 新龙县| 平顶山市| 邹平县| 遵义县| 太康县| 定兴县| 新竹市| 樟树市| 克山县| 秭归县| 昌都县| 霍州市| 合肥市| 七台河市| 老河口市| 广饶县| 无极县| 琼中| 水富县| 寿宁县| 运城市| 若尔盖县| 高淳县| 贵港市| 永昌县| 栾川县| 丰顺县| 崇左市| 鄄城县| 疏勒县| 当雄县| 监利县| 东阳市| 建平县| 布尔津县| 新昌县| 新源县| 苍南县| 资兴市| 德令哈市| 珲春市| 肥城市| 县级市| 石屏县| 奈曼旗| 教育| 高邑县| 乡城县| 金川县| 嘉禾县| 沁源县| 五大连池市| 吴堡县| 宁津县| 大悟县| 班玛县| 寿阳县| 海淀区| 武功县| 镇巴县| 白玉县| 博白县| 朝阳市| 历史| 名山县| 安阳县| 玉环县| 高邑县| 仪陇县| 陵川县| 全椒县| 连城县| 通海县| 灵台县| 遵义县| 秭归县| 当涂县| 吉安市| 台安县| 靖州|