男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Motoring

Lawsuits accuse top automakers of faulty air bags, delays

China Daily | Updated: 2018-03-19 11:06
Share
Share - WeChat
A Takata logo is seen on a display of child safety seats at a car showroom on June 26, 2017 in Tokyo, Japan.[Photo by Christopher Jue/Getty Images]

DETROIT-General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Volkswagen and Mercedes all knew of problems with dangerous exploding Takata air bag inflators years before issuing recalls, according to three class actions filed on Wednesday with the federal court in Miami.

The lawsuits cite company documents obtained through previous legal actions against other automakers over faulty Takata inflators.

The plaintiffs allege that automakers were informed of inflator defects during tests but delayed taking action.

Allegations against GM are among the most serious. Takata documents showed that GM employees expressed concerns about inflators rupturing as early as 2003.

GM on Wednesday called the lawsuit "baseless and without merit" and said it misstates "a host of material facts".

Mercedes-Benz called the allegations unfounded, and Fiat Chrysler declined to comment, saying it had not been served with a copy. Messages were left Wednesday seeking comment from VW.

Takata uses the chemical ammonium nitrate to create small explosions to inflate air bags. But the chemical can deteriorate when exposed to high temperatures and airborne moisture.

That causes it to explode with too much force, blowing apart a metal canister and hurling shrapnel. At least 22 people have died worldwide and more than 180 have been hurt.

The problem touched off the largest series of automotive recalls in US history, with 19 automakers having to recall up to 69 million inflators in 42 million vehicles.

The problem brought a criminal conviction and fine against Takata and forced the Japanese company into bankruptcy protection.

The lawsuits, which consolidate individual claims that were filed previously, allege that owners paid higher prices for their vehicles than they would have if the defect had been disclosed.

They allege that manufacturers picked Takata to supply inflators because the cost was less than other air bag makers who used different, less volatile chemicals as propellants.

"These auto manufacturers were well aware of the public safety risks posed by Takata's airbags long ago, and still waited years to disclose them to the public and take action," Peter Prieto, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.

In an April 2003 communication with Takata, GM was concerned about "ballistic variability", which is a tendency for the air bags to either underinflate or explode when deployed, the lawsuit against GM said.

In 2004, Takata employees met with GM officials about a tendency for the inflators to shoot flames when they ruptured, and in March of 2006, Takata reported that inflators tested for GM vehicles continued to show "aggressive behavior", including the escape of "molten propellant" when they ruptured.

Yet GM didn't issue any recalls until June 2014 when it recalled 29,000 Chevrolet Cruze compact cars from the 2013 and 2014 model years, according to the lawsuit.

"Defendants did nothing to meaningfully investigate the problem, notify the appropriate regulators or notify the class (car owners)," the lawsuit stated.

GM also received reports of real-world problems in 2011 and 2014, including one case in which a Cruze driver was blinded in one eye by an exploding inflator, according to the lawsuit. GM and Takata blamed the trouble on a manufacturing problem instead of the deteriorating ammonium nitrate.

"Rather than publicize the truth, both Takata and GM blamed the ruptures on a manufacturing problem," the lawsuit alleged.

Volkswagen, the lawsuit alleged, had repeated quality issues with Takata dating to 2003, even rejecting products after an audit. Yet no recalls were issued until 2016, the plaintiffs claimed.

Daimler, maker of Mercedes-Benz vehicles, had concerns about the integrity of Takata inflators in 2003, according to company emails.

In 2004, Mercedes engineers agreed to "forego key performance variables" and allow use of Takata inflators, the lawsuit stated. The company didn't do any recalls until 2016.

Fiat Chrysler didn't issue its first recall until 2014, even though its engineers expressed concerns about Takata inflators during the early 2000s, the lawsuit stated.

Last year Toyota, BMW, Mazda, Subaru, Nissan and Honda settled similar economic loss class actions for millions of dollars.

AP

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 铜山县| 庆城县| 西乡县| 河北区| 大理市| 若羌县| 桦南县| 鄢陵县| 德兴市| 莱阳市| 日喀则市| 洪江市| 平湖市| 肇源县| 崇阳县| 南木林县| 根河市| 茂名市| 广平县| 中西区| 宣武区| 余干县| 罗山县| 永新县| 土默特右旗| 顺义区| 宝鸡市| 忻州市| 龙陵县| 平遥县| 宜昌市| 阜新市| 新乡市| 睢宁县| 宜丰县| 信丰县| 南开区| 福建省| 常山县| 本溪市| 正安县| 桃源县| 江安县| 南开区| 奉节县| SHOW| 原阳县| 汉中市| 南京市| 永泰县| 得荣县| 涟源市| 沙河市| 隆回县| 青州市| 长海县| 绥江县| 莱西市| 德令哈市| 社旗县| 龙江县| 安化县| 溧水县| 永新县| 西贡区| 普陀区| 濮阳市| 许昌县| 新宁县| 滨州市| 平度市| 盐城市| 日喀则市| 汉寿县| 河津市| 夏邑县| 镇雄县| 花垣县| 东乡| 吉木萨尔县| 绿春县| 芦山县|