男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / China's Belt and Road

Italy can facilitate closer China, Europe ties on BRI

By Natan Colombo | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2018-09-10 14:20
Share
Share - WeChat
A large container ship is sailing in the waters of Italy as birds fly over it. [Photo/IC]

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is the most relevant economic, financial, trade, and infrastructural strategic plan China has implemented in order to revitalise its economic growth, promote new supranational financial institutions, increase Eurasian connectivity, facilitate free flow of goods, capital, knowledge and people, and reinforce its geopolitical role in the involved regions. Adopting a general oversimplification, it can be considered, mutatis mutandis, as a sort of China-driven Marshall Plan addressed to Central and South-Eastern Asian countries, mainly focused on reinforcing domestic and international connectivity, improving processes of rapid industrialisation, and establishing efficient commercial platforms.

Business transactions between China and the countries of the "Belt" (Asian and Eastern Europe countries) and the "Road" (South-eastern Asia countries, the Middle East, and Eastern Africa countries) are constantly increasing, producing a general enlargement of interconnectivity projects, financial investments, and bilateral trade agreements. The initiative is inevitably connected by causality with the reform and opening-up policy (celebrating its 40th anniversary this year) which started China's rapid economic development, transforming its economy from domestic-centred to export-oriented.

The constitution of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), as a fundamental step in the development of the BRI, is certainly part of a wider strategy China has put into action to promote its active role in the new global governance. The AIIB represents the BRI's main financial engine and financing network and its establishment gained the enthusiastic support of many European Countries. In 2015, the governments of several European countries officially announced to join the AIIB as funding members. This decision marked an unusual diplomatic approach for many of the involved European countries and, in particular, for Italy, which in the last 70 years has traditionally been US-oriented, Atlanticism-based, and strongly Europeanist.

Under an internal affairs perspective, Italy's participation in the AIIB underlined a new political attitude characterised by a much more distant relationship with the US government (against the US official request not to take part in the institution) and, in general, by a wider anti-Europeanism. It should not be surprising that both anti-Atlanticism and anti-Europeanism are the main ideologies promoted by the two major political parties (the Five Star Movement and the Northern League) the current government, a atypical administration indeed, is made up of.

In the near future, the relationships between China and the European countries involved in the BRI will be principally based on economic and trade cooperation. China is paying attention to countries such as Italy, Greece, and Portugal, which need infrastructural and financial investments and are quite weak in the EU, both economically and politically. Among all the other European countries, there is a race to become the Chinese best partner in the EU, considering also the damages in the import/export produced by the protectionist policies currently implemented by the Trump administration.

Under this perspective, Italy can effectively cover this role since it can facilitate Sino-European relationships as well as provide great benefits for the Initiative in terms of logistic connection between Asia and Europe through its strategic infrastructures in the Mediterranean Sea which link Southern Europe to Central and Northern Europe. The recent official visit to Beijing of a delegation led by the Italian Minister of Finance, Giovanni Tria, was aimed to strengthen the special partnership between the Chinese and the Italian governments and to promote Chinese investments addressed to key Italian companies and to Italian Government Bonds, especially when there is the almost absolute certainty that the ECB is going to stop the Quantitative Easing policy soon. The Chinese Central Bank (PBOC) owns significant shares in the largest Italian banks, while Bank of China holds stake in Telecom and Prysmian Group (Italian companies in the telecommunication industry).

Moreover, the Silk Road Fund already owns 5 percent of shares of Autostrade per l'Italia Spa (the company in charge of the Italian highways network's management) and many other Chinese companies invested in the equities of strategic Italian companies, confirming a deep integration between the Chinese and Italian companies.

Generally speaking, structural challenges in the BRI are arising with specific regard to the geopolitical reactions of China's neighboring countries to the new global governance the Initiative is shaping and the delicate matters of its financial sustainability in the long run, in terms of solvency and liquidity of the loans provided to the participating countries. How the BRI will develop in the future is a hot issue, at the centre of analyses and studies carried on by both Chinese and foreign scholars and analysts. The commonly shared perspective is that China is steadily arising under a global governance perspective.

The Chinese government is promoting a win-win strategy for all the parties which join the BRI. Potential competitors, such as the US, India, Japan, and Russia have been invited to become part of BRI. International cooperation under China's leadership can eventually support the BRI countries to develop their economic and trade systems, to reinforce their competitive advantages and, ideally, to fulfill their dreams.

Natan Colombo is a professor of economics, finance, and law at Hainan-Austria Tourism Department of Hainan Tropical Ocean University.

The opinions expressed here are those of the writer and do not represent the views of China Daily and China Daily website.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 通城县| 荥经县| 龙岩市| 深泽县| 建湖县| 东阿县| 辽阳市| 西青区| 正阳县| 宜丰县| 苍梧县| 洮南市| 嘉黎县| 固镇县| 张家港市| 镇沅| 南昌县| 临武县| 金乡县| 阿坝县| 广州市| 沭阳县| 申扎县| 仁寿县| 临桂县| 绥芬河市| 万宁市| 定襄县| 平顶山市| 崇信县| 广东省| 天柱县| 巴林左旗| 重庆市| 峨山| 都匀市| 西林县| 西华县| 名山县| 乌鲁木齐县| 广德县| 缙云县| 兰州市| 灌阳县| 准格尔旗| 安龙县| 嘉兴市| 黄平县| 天津市| 邵东县| 东乌| 富民县| 冀州市| 炎陵县| 晋宁县| 黑水县| 孟州市| 白城市| 虞城县| 黄大仙区| 克山县| 汉寿县| 东明县| 韩城市| 育儿| 民乐县| 阳山县| 铜山县| 邛崃市| 上蔡县| 乌什县| 老河口市| 睢宁县| 许昌市| 淅川县| 会同县| 潮安县| 北碚区| 柳州市| 上饶县| 洪湖市| 涟水县|