男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

Black Hole image ownership triggers heated debate

By Zhang Yangfei and Cao Yin | China Daily | Updated: 2019-04-22 02:36
Share
Share - WeChat

On April 15, the Shanghai Observer reported that the company, which was founded in June 2000 and partners with the photo agency Getty Images in the United States, had faced increased copyright-related disputes since it set up a special rights protection division in 2016.

The company was involved 2,279 cases in 2017 and 1,908 last year, the report said, adding that most court rulings had been in its favor.

A search by China Daily for the company's name on China Judgments Online, a website operated by the Supreme People's Court that discloses verdicts, resulted in more than 1,600 lawsuits being found, most of them related to copyright.

In April 2017, for example, the company took technology giant Tencent to court and asked for 180,000 yuan in compensation after Tencent used nine Visual China Group images without permission, Beijing Youth Daily reported.

Tencent said the images involved could also be found on other websites, or the company could not prove it had authorization for the photos. The court finally ordered Tencent to pay 40,000 yuan to Visual China, the report added.

Wang Weiwei, a lawyer from the Beijing Zhongwen Law Firm, said, "Mushrooming copyright-related disputes can be acceptable if a stock-image agency, such as Visual China Group, gets authorization for images from copyright owners.

"Any litigation caused by true copyright infringement is no problem and is justified, as it is also to help protect the legitimate rights and interest of the copyright owners," he said.

"But if the stock-image platform doesn't get authorization but still asks for compensation by resorting to litigation, I think such behavior may be an alleged fraud," he said.

The core of the problem lies in whether stock-image providers get authorization from copyright owners, he added.

Zhao Zhanling, a legal researcher who specializes in intellectual property cases at the China University of Political Science and Law, agreed, but said copyright owners and institutes given copyright authorization should respect this right and not abuse it for gain.

He said stock-image companies need to make authorization a priority in their operations and pay more effort to finding a balance between commercial interest and public interest.

The litigation right that is to safeguard copyrights must not be abused, he added.

|<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next   >>|
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 蒲城县| 开封县| 亳州市| 昭平县| 定日县| 东台市| 吉木乃县| 密云县| 镇平县| 陆川县| 中江县| 雅安市| 嘉兴市| 庆云县| 双流县| 南平市| 苏尼特左旗| 工布江达县| 呼玛县| 桦川县| 白河县| 上栗县| 陇西县| 莒南县| 澄城县| 峡江县| 尼勒克县| 岱山县| 洛宁县| 青神县| 长治市| 全南县| 德阳市| 五常市| 龙山县| 仲巴县| 阿合奇县| 乐东| 凭祥市| 天门市| 津市市| 长沙县| 南平市| 高淳县| 育儿| 浮梁县| 棋牌| 保康县| 彝良县| 抚州市| 什邡市| 南投市| 永修县| 丰都县| 丹凤县| 民丰县| 万荣县| 罗城| 呈贡县| 历史| 涿州市| 顺平县| 高雄市| 麻城市| 桃园市| 耿马| 利津县| 宁城县| 武汉市| 寿阳县| 水城县| 方正县| 炎陵县| 庄河市| 邹城市| 温泉县| 明水县| 南陵县| 枞阳县| 巴彦淖尔市| 政和县| 呼伦贝尔市|