男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / China-US

CEO: FedEx cannot be US govt's policeman

By Heng Weili in New York and Liu Zhihua in Beijing | China Daily | Updated: 2019-06-26 23:32
Share
Share - WeChat
A FedEx delivery worker carries a package for a delivery in Wilmette, Illinois, Oct 27, 2015. [Photo/Agencies]

As FedEx Corp faces pressure after mishandling packages involving China's Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, the US company has sued the US government, claiming that it is "a transportation company, not a law enforcement agency."

FedEx filed a suit on Monday in US District Court in Washington DC, seeking to enjoin the US Department of Commerce from enforcing prohibitions contained in the Export Administration Regulations, also known as the EAR.

Frederick W. Smith, the company's CEO and chairman, told Fox News that FedEx cannot be the US government's policeman for export and import controls.

"Huawei is just emblematic of the problem," Smith said.

"The Huawei incident concerns two packages, two out of 15 million ... That is exactly the kind of confusing situation when any tiny number of packages becomes an international cause celebre, because of these regulations that make FedEX and other common carriers responsible for government regulations to prohibit exports and imports, to certify that the shipper who may or may not be telling the truth is in compliance with those exports regulations.

"Despite the fact that we have 15 million shipments a day, and if we make an error on any one of them, without a trial, without any due process, we can be fined $250,000 for a piece."

He said the company doesn't think these regulations are based on law.

"FedEx believes that the EAR violate common carriers' rights to due process under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution as they unreasonably hold common carriers strictly liable for shipments that may violate the EAR without requiring evidence that the carriers had knowledge of any violations," FedEx said in a statement.

"This puts an impossible burden on a common carrier such as FedEx to know the origin and technological makeup of the contents of all the shipments it handles and whether they comply with the EAR."

Last month, FedEx rerouted four packages bound for Huawei's headquarters in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, to the United States, claiming "inadvertent misrouting."

The incident led to a regulatory investigation by the Chinese government "on suspicion of undermining the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese clients."

Over the weekend, FedEx returned a New York-bound package containing a Huawei smartphone, a P30 Pro, to the sender at PCMag's office in London.

According to Fortune.com, FedEx returned the phone with a note saying the shipment was voided due to a "US government issue with Huawei and the Chinese government."

FedEx's filing on Monday said that the US Department of Commerce restrictions "essentially deputize Fed-Ex to police the content of the millions of packages it ships daily even though doing so is a virtually impossible task, logistically, economically, and in many cases, legally."

On May 16, the US Department of Commerce placed Huawei and 68 affiliates on an "Entity List" that restricts companies from providing Huawei and its affiliates with technology originating in the US without government approval. On May 20, however, the US Department of Commerce said there would be a 90-day grace period before the Huawei restrictions went into effect.

The lawsuit did not mention the Huawei incidents specifically.

"1,100 entities are now on the list (of the US Department of Commerce), with five more just added on Friday. It is impossible even with the fantastic computer systems and compliance investigation we made that we simply cannot be the policeman for the US Department of Commerce," Smith said.

A spokesman for the US Department of Commerce told The Wall Street Journal that it had yet to review FedEx's complaint.

FedEx's main rival, United Parcel Service Inc, said on Tuesday it would not be a party to the lawsuit.

The US has accused Huawei of violating sanctions against Iran, a country with which it is currently involved in an escalating political dispute.

Huawei has said that the US sanctions could cost it billions of dollars in revenue. Numerous US semiconductor companies also stand to lose substantial business with Huawei due to the restrictions.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 辽阳市| 天津市| 门源| 平原县| 木里| 淳化县| 东方市| 蒲城县| 登封市| 黑龙江省| 衡阳市| 错那县| 赣州市| 铜川市| 云龙县| 北辰区| 洪洞县| 交口县| 贡山| 顺昌县| 南陵县| 蒙自县| 缙云县| 拜城县| 金乡县| 宣化县| 永年县| 梨树县| 长子县| 牙克石市| 灵台县| 甘洛县| 江北区| 依安县| 丹巴县| 文安县| 宣威市| 天台县| 营山县| 句容市| 南宁市| 乌鲁木齐市| 聂拉木县| 常熟市| 广昌县| 黄浦区| 龙州县| 张家界市| 陆河县| 尼木县| 汕头市| 布尔津县| 石嘴山市| 南川市| 苏尼特右旗| 额尔古纳市| 沅陵县| 东丽区| 巴彦淖尔市| 临武县| 铜梁县| 壤塘县| 湘潭县| 乾安县| 上虞市| 四子王旗| 青浦区| 平安县| 长寿区| 同仁县| 黑龙江省| 色达县| 广宗县| 江陵县| 高碑店市| 双流县| 宾川县| 昌吉市| 荔波县| 长葛市| 随州市| 宝清县|