男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Huawei ex-employee case needs proper solution

By Zhang Zhouxiang | China Daily | Updated: 2019-12-04 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat
JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

Li Hongyuan, a former employee of Huawei, who had worked for the company for 13 years, was arrested in January after the company sued him for extortion because he received 300,000 yuan ($42,700) in compensation from the company for the termination of his employment. He was detained for 251 days until August, when he was released because of "unclear criminal facts and insufficient evidence". China Daily writer Zhang Zhouxiang comments:

Li's compensation payment was transferred by the department head through the personal bank account of the department secretary, and the memorandum of transaction was "economic compensation for termination".

Citing the transfer record of the payment via the personal account of the department secretary, Huawei accused Li of blackmail.

However, all charges against Li have been dropped. For his 251 days of detainment, he received compensation of about 107,752 yuan ($15,307) from the procuratorate responsible.

In other words, Huawei's decision to call the police has led to the detainment of an innocent person, and the loss of taxpayers' money.

After the case was made public online, Huawei issued a news release, saying that the company has both the obligation and right to call the police when it suspects any employees of illegal activities.

According to reports, the local procuratorate of Longgang district, Shenzhen city, that handled the case promised to send official letters to Huawei and the company where Li's father serves, so as to clear Li's image and mend his reputation. That shows the judiciary is aware of the negative effects that a false accusation can cause an innocent person when he is suspected of a crime and gets detained. The judiciary is doing its best to help Li recover his reputation.

It would be better for Huawei to do the same. After all, Li is a former employee who served the company for more than 10 years. If Huawei does not acknowledge that it has wronged him, that will only damage its image.

According to reports, Li said he hoped Huawei could talk with him about the issue.

It would be best if the two sides can solve the case via friendly means, as this would benefit both parties and avoid abusing judicial resources.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 丹东市| 绩溪县| 赤峰市| 塘沽区| 陆丰市| 天峻县| 临洮县| 温宿县| 岳阳市| 陕西省| 富蕴县| 固镇县| 永嘉县| 昆山市| 北票市| 正阳县| 武清区| 长岭县| 城固县| 宜良县| 巴林右旗| 宜兴市| 古浪县| 浙江省| 阿尔山市| 手游| 弥勒县| 淳安县| 大姚县| 鱼台县| 工布江达县| 浙江省| 呼玛县| 西和县| 响水县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 奈曼旗| 湖北省| 靖安县| 金川县| 寿阳县| 玛沁县| 琼海市| 哈密市| 乐业县| 八宿县| 惠安县| 桃园县| 常熟市| 中江县| 杭州市| 离岛区| 中牟县| 安丘市| 宁陵县| 乐陵市| 吉安市| 丘北县| 辽宁省| 卓资县| 凤山市| 永新县| 广西| 西藏| 五莲县| 夏邑县| 定西市| 武威市| 千阳县| 海安县| 井研县| 永定县| 大同县| 顺昌县| 宁陕县| 阿克| 六安市| 河北省| 白沙| 大足县| 时尚| 加查县|