男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Past the point of no return

By ZOU ZHIBO | China Daily Global | Updated: 2020-04-23 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat
MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

New wave of globalization propelled by new technology will not be reversed by the pandemic

The once-in-a-century pandemic has had a huge impact on people, countries and the world at large. One of the most frequently asked questions is: What will the world look like after the novel coronavirus is tamed? In particular, will the current trajectory of globalization change?

The great uncertainties surrounding the pandemic have made pessimism prevail, as a result globalization will be scaled back, and the world will enter an era of "staggered" globalization, or even an era of de-globalization and counter-globalization.

The free flow of people and the interconnectedness of countries that have characterized globalization, to some extent, caused and exacerbated the spread of the novel coronavirus. The division of labor on a global scale also contributed to the shortages and even cutoffs of anti-epidemic materials in some countries.

The pandemic has highlighted the importance of independent industrial chains. As transport has been closed down in face of the spread of the virus, it has highlighted that industrial autonomy is essential to protect national security and even people's lives. New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo lamented in a televised speech that anti-epidemic supplies, from masks, protective clothing, goggles to test kits and ventilators, are all imported, mainly from China.

It is foreseeable, therefore, that after the pandemic is controlled, many countries will call back their overseas industrial chains and cultivate domestic industries relating to people's livelihoods and basic needs, which will impact the global industrial chains, value chains and supply chains.

Also the pandemic has raised awareness of state sovereignty, which will make it more difficult for states to transfer their sovereign decision-making in future to reach or participate in international agreements. This will undoubtedly be a curb to globalization.

The pandemic has also amplified the rhetoric of counter-globalization. With the pandemic causing an economic recession and a decline in living standards, racism, populism and extremism are on the rise. Globalization then will become the scapegoat of the foreseeable social chaos.

Standing at this historical watershed, what we need is sober reflection on the future.

It is not difficult to see that the pandemic will influence the development of the world, but with the caveat that from an objective, historical perspective, the pandemic is only a breaker in the tides of human history, albeit one exerting a far-ranging influence on the world. The factor driving human history forward is productivity and the mode of production. Other factors, even one as big as a pandemic, will not reverse or determine the direction, they can only accelerate or delay the trends.

The process of globalization has continually strengthened the connections of the world by expediting the flows of people, technology, capital, information and services, enhancing the awareness of a global community. At the preliminary stage, globalization was basically an economic and trade concept; but as the years have gone by, its connotations have been enriched and extended into political, security, social and cultural spheres.

Globalization was powered by social productivity and the modes of production. Its embryo can be traced back to the great epoch of maritime navigation starting from the end of the 15th century when marine technologies and geographical discovery brought together the world. Thereafter, the three technological revolutions, especially the third one featuring telecommunication technologies made the world smaller and formed an interconnected community with intertwined interests.

The emergence of the fourth technological revolution nowadays, which features internet industrialization, industrial intelligence and industrial integration, have only quickened the trend of globalization. New technologies such as artificial intelligence, quantum information, new energy and modern biologics will realize the fusion of physical and information systems, the internet of things-plus.

Against this backdrop, the connections between people, between people and the society, and between states will be even closer. All human beings are becoming a community of shared interests, responsibilities and destiny. Anyone or any country will find it hard to survive if isolated from the wider global community.

Another reason why globalization is not stoppable is the profit-seeking nature of economic activities. Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations proposed that human nature is self-interest and that the pursuit of personal interests is the only motivation for people to engage in economic activities. That remains true today: Economic activities hinge on the doctrine of maximizing profits, so the elements of production flow globally.

Hit by the pandemic, countries are expected to roll out protective measures that rein in economic activities, such as developing industrial autonomy or even establishing total factor industrial chain.

But our profit-driven nature determines that these practices are temporary and partial. For most countries, the costs of building a total factor industrial chain are huge. So the idea will fade over time and countries will again resort to globalization to make the allocation of resources reasonable and efficient so as to maximize the interests of all parties.

In short, the novel coronavirus may lead to a contraction of globalization, but will not reverse the trend. In particular, the emergence of the fourth technological revolution will help the world get out of the low ebb, and head for the globalization in a faster pace.

The author is deputy director of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 曲松县| 宣城市| 开原市| 嘉善县| 宝山区| 遂昌县| 曲周县| 金川县| 沙河市| 霍山县| 沅陵县| 兴仁县| 廊坊市| 乌兰察布市| 杨浦区| 神农架林区| 屏山县| 郸城县| 遂平县| 德保县| 乐平市| 吉林省| 乌什县| 武城县| 镇巴县| 航空| 西华县| 平塘县| 曲靖市| 吉木乃县| 云和县| 林芝县| 霞浦县| 楚雄市| 商水县| 泾阳县| 宝丰县| 永宁县| 津市市| 富平县| 全南县| 元阳县| 凤冈县| 连南| 察隅县| 清远市| 宜章县| 广饶县| 交口县| 武川县| 台南市| 长沙县| 大港区| 临桂县| 澄城县| 克东县| 湖南省| 牙克石市| 孙吴县| 阜新市| 荣成市| 清远市| 闵行区| 盖州市| 阿荣旗| 铜鼓县| 将乐县| 泽普县| 页游| 涪陵区| 木里| 无锡市| 华安县| 潍坊市| 南澳县| 文山县| 合川市| 宁阳县| 麦盖提县| 长沙县| 海淀区| 大理市|