男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

UK will pay price if it carries out decision to exclude Huawei: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2020-05-24 20:19
Share
Share - WeChat
Huawei 5G Innovation and Experience Center in London, Britain, Jan 28, 2020. [Photo/Xinhua]

Following a January decision to grant Chinese telecommunications equipment supplier Huawei a limited role in the United Kingdom's 5G networks, Downing Street is reportedly planning for the company's full phaseout from those networks by 2023.

If true, this would be a very costly policy reversal that would cause an all-lose scenario for all stakeholders, and one whose ramifications would undoubtedly ripple far beyond technological concerns.

Huawei may have dreamed of being what it is today — a leading global 5G solutions provider — and a flag-flyer for Chinese high technology. Company founder Ren Zhengfei is famous for that ambition anyway. However, in realizing that ambition, the company has become politicized beyond anyone's imagination.

Under mounting pressure from Washington, the "national security threat" argument is rapidly poisoning Huawei's international business environment. What the British government is allegedly planning comes as a further stab in the company's back following the latest US attempt to cut the company's supply lines.

The British government's January decision that excluded Huawei from supplying "core" technologies and equipment and capped its market share to 35 percent, wasn't fair at all. All the allegations against the company appear to have been built on the fears that Huawei may become a prevailing presence in Western telecommunications networks, and that China has a strong government.

Except for that, there has been no credible evidence offered whatsoever despite all the security threat clamor.

But Huawei accepted that conditional involvement — at least it wasn't complete exclusion.

What is reportedly happening now, however, is different. It means significant escalation of discriminative government interference, which almost certainly will meet retaliatory responses from Beijing.

While the UK is no doubt hoping that toeing the US line on Huawei will help it gain a favorable trade deal with the United States, with which it began negotiations this month, the benefits are likely to be offset by the losses.

Unlike working together to address misgivings regarding security, pushing a certain company out of a country's market simply because of its national identity is not only against market economy rules, but also a very unfriendly gesture against the latter's country of origin.

Since the Chinese government has attached great significance to the way Huawei is treated overseas, and literally taken it increasingly as a test stone of bilateral ties, its reaction to such a decision should be easy to predict.

Losing the UK market will no doubt be a heavy blow to Huawei. But Huawei won't be the sole loser.

Besides satisfying the China hawks in Washington and London's political offices, such a decision will deliver little benefit to the UK itself.

Kicking out Huawei equipment from British networks will considerably increase the financial burdens for service providers, delay 5G rollout in the country, hurt relations with China, darken the UK's post-Brexit economic prospects, and erode confidence in the UK's long-standing reputation as a market economy.

British telecom operators from EE to Three have aired concerns about the high cost of replacing Huawei. They are foremost victims of politicization. Along with the numerous customers waiting for the broadband access Prime Minister Boris Johnson promised.

For the governments in Beijing and London, this is ultimately a matter of trust. Once trust is gone, all the rhetoric about collaboration will sound hollow.

At a time when the world badly needs solidarity amid a devastating pandemic, a decision like this will only worsen the atmosphere for international cooperation.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 东丽区| 奉新县| 双柏县| 东兰县| 安乡县| 余干县| 新津县| 马龙县| 临高县| 双流县| 鸡东县| 灵台县| 锡林郭勒盟| 沈阳市| 阳新县| 甘肃省| 柳河县| 保德县| 胶州市| 蓬安县| 贡嘎县| 建水县| 西吉县| 武鸣县| 历史| 巴南区| 德安县| 娱乐| 禹州市| 西乌| 达州市| 铜鼓县| 宁城县| 涟水县| 金平| 滦平县| 莱芜市| 延安市| 孟连| 衡水市| 静安区| 肥乡县| 龙游县| 武穴市| 绍兴市| 郑州市| 弥勒县| 睢宁县| 九龙县| 定州市| 凤台县| 自治县| 海盐县| 甘肃省| 老河口市| 平度市| 新乐市| 泸定县| 东乌| 凉城县| 龙游县| 苏尼特左旗| 深圳市| 大足县| 安图县| 合川市| 青浦区| 贵阳市| 华容县| 阿勒泰市| 莱芜市| 济南市| 阳信县| 郁南县| 仪陇县| 自治县| 沛县| 厦门市| 且末县| 普兰店市| 庐江县| 百色市|