男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Motoring

US automakers take big steps in quality survey

By LI FUSHENG | China Daily | Updated: 2020-06-29 10:16
Share
Share - WeChat
US carmaker GM presents its GMC truck at the 2nd China International Import Expo in 2019. [Photo/LI FUSHENG FOR CHINA DAILY]

Detroit-area automakers made their strongest showing ever in an annual survey of vehicle quality in the United States, as once-dominant Japanese brands faded.

The annual survey by JD Power also found that luxury brands performed below the industry average, often because they come equipped with more glitchy new electronics than mainstream brands.

Most Detroit-area brands outpaced the industry average in problems per 100 vehicles, with Fiat Chrysler's Dodge brand tying for first place with Kia of South Korea. It was the first time a Detroit brand finished first in the survey, now in its 34th year.

Five of the top 10 brands were from Detroit, with Chevrolet and Ram tied for third, followed by Genesis, Mitsubishi, Buick, GMC, Volkswagen and Hyundai. Dodge and Kia tied at 136 problems per 100 vehicles.

Land Rover ranked last with owners reporting 228 problems per 100 vehicles, followed by Audi, Volvo, Mercedes-Benz and Jaguar. Toyota, which traditionally ranks in the top 10, dropped below the industry average to 21st out of 32 brands included in the survey with 177 problems per 100 vehicles.

Detroit automakers benefited from a change in the study's methodology, which was updated this year to include more questions about new technology, said Doug Betts, president of JD Power's Automotive Division and a former quality chief for Fiat Chrysler.

The survey is redone every five years, and questions were added about features that didn't exist during the last update, he said. As a result, owners reported more problems within the first 90 days of owning 2020 models, raising the industry average from a record low 93 problems per 100 vehicles last year to 166 problems this year.

That doesn't mean quality is getting worse, Betts said. It just means that more questions were asked about newer features. Some questions, such as those about exterior rust or outside lights failing, were dropped from the survey because they don't happen very often anymore, he said.

Infotainment systems remained the most problematic category, accounting for almost one-quarter of all problems. The biggest owner complaints were about poor voice recognition systems or difficulty connecting vehicles to Android Auto or Apple CarPlay systems.

In the past, the survey found mechanical problems often plagued Detroit automakers. But over the years, the differences evened out with nearly all automakers performing well, Betts said.

That leaves the performance of new technology as the main factor differentiating between brands.

The Dodge brand, which for years has ranked low in quality, was aided by its relatively old model lineup, because engineers have had time to work out bugs, Betts said. The highest-ranked vehicle in the survey was the Chevrolet Sonic subcompact, with only 103 problems per 100 vehicles, largely because it's been produced for eight years and doesn't have many new electronic features, Betts said.

For the first time, the survey included a score for electric car maker Tesla, which had a very high 250 problems per 100 vehicles. Betts said the score can't be ranked against other brands because JD Power wasn't able to survey Tesla owners in all states.

In 15 states, JD Power needs a manufacturer's permission to survey owners, which Tesla refuses to allow, Betts said. So the score doesn't include states including California, where Tesla sells many of its vehicles, he said.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宿州市| 康定县| 汤原县| 漳州市| 苏尼特右旗| 芜湖县| 皋兰县| 合肥市| 抚州市| 朝阳市| 尼勒克县| 岳阳市| 民权县| 高州市| 玉林市| 阜阳市| 南汇区| 南皮县| 珠海市| 横峰县| 桃园市| 太康县| 隆化县| 修武县| 恭城| 铁岭县| 淮南市| 临海市| 宣恩县| 探索| 合水县| 浙江省| 砀山县| 武城县| 青阳县| 马公市| 怀安县| 泾源县| 武陟县| 灵石县| 布拖县| 无棣县| 同德县| 大英县| 调兵山市| 仲巴县| 辛集市| 上林县| 区。| 修武县| 平塘县| 古交市| 乡宁县| 双鸭山市| 卫辉市| 滕州市| 正阳县| 信阳市| 灵璧县| 梅河口市| 五大连池市| 丽江市| 泗水县| 马鞍山市| 敖汉旗| 堆龙德庆县| 萨嘎县| 宾川县| 岳阳市| 普洱| 上蔡县| 遵义市| 石景山区| 恩施市| 云南省| 卢湾区| 武城县| 名山县| 仁寿县| 高要市| 河源市| 古田县|