男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Ruling provides wake-up call to US dreams of digital hegemony

By Wang Haibin | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2020-09-25 19:35
Share
Share - WeChat
The Facebook logo is displayed on a mobile phone in this picture illustration taken Dec 2, 2019. [Photo/Agencies]

On Tuesday, Facebook is reported as saying it might quit Europe if the ban on sharing data with the US gets enforced, which became possible after a ruling by the European Court of Justice in July found "there were insufficient safeguards against snooping by US intelligence agencies".

If that came true, that would be a huge loss for Facebook. So the question becomes: Why does it insist on sharing user data with the US, despite such a huge risk?

That's because the US tries to lead, dominate and reshape the rules of global flows of data. There was a time when the US dominated in the world digital economy, but the emergence of mass mobile terminals in Europe and Asia-Pacific granted them the ability to challenge this old hegemony. In order to maintain advantages in digital economy as an extension of its global strategic advantages, the US hopes to enforce its rules on the rest of the world.

Protection of data is a key point of disputes. Since the PRISM NSA surveillance program was exposed in 2013, the EU has been accelerating legislation to regulate trans-border data flows to protect personal and business privacy, yet the US insists on "free" flow of data over borders to maintain its own dominance.

These tensions were intensified by the above-mentioned ruling of the EU court in July, which actually invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield Agreement. In other words, the previous negotiations between the two sides on trans-border data flows were made obsolete.

Europe is only one place where the US hopes to implement its own rules. In the Asia-Pacific region, the US relies on multilateral agreements to form a circle that allows data to flow "freely" over borders. Sometimes it uses long-arm jurisdiction to strike at enterprises that protect data and curb unnecessary flow over borders, and TikTok is just one victim of this practice.

It should be noted the US' advocated "free" flow of data is not free at all; on the contrary, it hopes to bring data under its control. There are no signs Europe will give up ground to please the US, and China is firm in defending its own sovereignty in the sphere of data, too. It's time for the US to wake up from its illusion of controlling everything.

The author is an associate professor at the School of International Relations at the University of International Business and Economics.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 安乡县| 周至县| 涡阳县| 泽普县| 乌兰浩特市| 湛江市| 盘锦市| 阿克陶县| 恩平市| 印江| 邛崃市| 新乡县| 习水县| 同仁县| 江阴市| 万盛区| 湾仔区| 云安县| 江山市| 金华市| 观塘区| 扶沟县| 嘉义市| 延庆县| 德格县| 读书| 林甸县| 桑植县| 苏尼特右旗| 长寿区| 许昌县| 广汉市| 繁峙县| 宣化县| 石屏县| 唐河县| 林西县| 勃利县| 剑川县| 平遥县| 平昌县| 襄垣县| 镇平县| 共和县| 闻喜县| 南开区| 安达市| 云梦县| 威海市| 项城市| 名山县| 武宁县| 贵德县| 台州市| 凤城市| 十堰市| 宁化县| 清新县| 睢宁县| 上高县| 汾阳市| 台州市| 方城县| 罗田县| 白水县| 五家渠市| 宁德市| 明溪县| 乌什县| 板桥市| 东平县| 同江市| 陇川县| 胶州市| 永寿县| 霍山县| 招远市| 长武县| 楚雄市| 饶阳县| 宿州市| 盐源县|