男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Comment

Push back against US bid to dominate data

By Wang Haibin | China Daily | Updated: 2020-09-28 00:00
Share
Share - WeChat

On Tuesday, Facebook was reported as saying that it might quit Europe if the European Union enforces its ban on sharing data with the United States, which became possible after a ruling by the European Court of Justice in July found that "there were insufficient safeguards against snooping by US intelligence agencies".

If that came true, that would be a huge blow to Facebook. So the question becomes: Why does it insist on sharing user data with the US at such a huge risk?

That's because the US is trying to lead, dominate, even reshape the rules for the transborder flow of data. There was a time when the US dominated the global digital economy, but the emergence of mass mobile terminals in Europe and the Asia-Pacific granted them the ability to challenge this old hegemony. In order to maintain its advantages in the digital economy as part of its global strategic advantages, the US hopes to write the rules for the global digital economy.

Protection of data is a key point of dispute. Since the Prism Project was revealed in 2013, the EU has been accelerating legislation to regulate transborder data flows to protect personal privacy and business privacy, yet the US insists on the "free" flow of data over borders as a means to maintain its own dominance.

Their tensions were made even higher by the above-mentioned ruling of the EU court in July, which actually invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield Agreement. In other words, the previous negotiations between the two sides on transborder data flows became ineffective.

Europe is only one place where the US hopes to implement its version of rules. In the Asia-Pacific, the US relies more on multilateral agreements to form a circle that allows data to flow "freely" across borders. Sometimes it uses long-arm jurisdiction to strike at the enterprises that protect data and curb its unnecessary flow over borders, TikTok being a typical victim of that.

It should be noted that the US' advocated "free" flow of data is not free at all. On the contrary, it hopes to put the data under its control. There is no hint that the EU will give ground to please the US, and China is standing firm in defending its own sovereignty in the data sphere as well. The US should rid itself of the illusion it can control everything.

-WANG HAIBIN, AN ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS.

 

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 家居| 苍溪县| 格尔木市| 罗田县| 滦南县| 长丰县| 天峨县| 白银市| 金寨县| 竹溪县| 集安市| 汝南县| 常宁市| SHOW| 饶阳县| 博兴县| 荥经县| 集贤县| 衡阳县| 天峨县| 琼海市| 武鸣县| 宣汉县| 静安区| 壤塘县| 临高县| 北安市| 平乡县| 宁国市| 舟曲县| 乐清市| 尼玛县| 肃南| 海原县| 阿城市| 德州市| 上杭县| 宝应县| 大兴区| 仲巴县| 普宁市| 淄博市| 门头沟区| 长武县| 天镇县| 仁化县| 太仆寺旗| 措美县| 无为县| 夏邑县| 富宁县| 鹤山市| 南宁市| 永安市| 鄢陵县| 远安县| 平乡县| 和平区| 新平| 乐至县| 岳阳市| 黄骅市| 佛学| 连平县| 金溪县| 织金县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 巴彦县| 灵石县| 中西区| 高碑店市| 岱山县| 郸城县| 惠东县| 浮山县| 广安市| 教育| 商城县| 浦江县| 沂水县| 鄂尔多斯市| 洛浦县|