男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / China-US

Analysis: Decoupling could trim 1% off US GDP

By ZHAO HUANXIN in Washington | China Daily Global | Updated: 2021-02-19 11:10
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/Agencies]

The United States would forgo $190 billion in its gross domestic product annually by 2025, or roughly 1 percent of its GDP at last year's level, if it were to fully decouple with China, a scenario that would force the US aviation industry alone to shed close to a quarter-million jobs, according to an analysis by the US Chamber of Commerce and Rhodium Group.

The projections highlight the potential costs to the American economy at a time when the Biden administration is grappling with a pandemic-battered economy and weighing its policy agenda with China.

"If the US and China were to fully decouple, American businesses and our economy would be significantly impacted, resulting in hundreds of billions in foregone GDP and capital gains losses while undermining US productivity and innovation," the US Chamber tweeted on Thursday about the report released Wednesday.

The first-of-its-kind study, "Understanding US-China Decoupling: Macro Trends and Industry Impacts", seeks to better understand the degree to which the US and Chinese economies are intertwined and dependent on each other for stability and growth, the chamber said in a statement.

The report uses a full decoupling scenario, defined as bilateral flows going to zero, because that provides the most complete look at the potential impact of the current trajectory of the US-China economic relationship, according to the authors of the analysis.

A complete disengagement also would significantly curtail investment, people and idea flows, as well as to key areas of national importance to the US, noted the report.

For example, US investors could lose $25 billion annually in capital gains, and one-time GDP losses could reach $500 billion if US companies reduce cumulative foreign direct investment (FDI) in China by 50 percent.

The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the economic impact from lost Chinese tourism and education spending. If future flows are reduced by half from their pre-pandemic levels, the US would lose between $15 billion and $30 billion a year in services trade exports, according to the analysis.

For the US aviation industry, a loss of access to China, the largest export market for US aircraft, would cause $38 billion to $51 billion in annual output and lead to the US civil aviation manufacturing industry shedding 167,000 to 225,000 jobs, according to the report.

"If we were to try to cut off everything, or the preponderance of our economic engagement with China, (it) would be so expensive that it would make everyone, even the most hawkish Americans and national security professionals, very uncomfortable," Daniel Rosen, founding partner of Rhodium Group, said at a virtual release event for the report.

As US policymakers debate the next phase of US-China engagement, they should consider the major takeaways of the analysis: Data analysis is critical to policymaking, and China policy requires economic-impact assessment, cost-benefit analysis, and a process of public debate and discovery, the chamber and Rhodium Group said in a release.

US President Joe Biden has said his administration would not handle relations with Beijing "the way Trump did", and "we're ready to work with Beijing, when it's in America's interest to do so".

Biden has so far not answered the question of whether he will keep his predecessor's controversial tariffs of up to 25 percent on most Chinese imports, noted Edward Alden, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Biden's press secretary, Jen Psaki, has said Biden is evaluating tariffs on Chinese goods and wants to coordinate future steps with allies.

Steeply high and sweeping tariffs are one of the hallmark decoupling policies of the Trump administration. US import tariffs, for example, cover more than 75 percent of aviation-related products imported from China.

"The Biden administration should know that a decoupling strategy is not popular with the EU or other US allies," said Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow and trade expert at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

"From the Rhodium analysis, it should learn that decoupling is not popular with US business and will ensure higher costs and spark inflation in the US," Hufbauer told China Daily.

In their first phone call last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping told Biden that the two sides should re-establish the various dialogue mechanisms and that the economic and other authorities of the two countries also should have more contacts.

Hufbauer suggested trusted interlocutors, possibly Kurt Campbell, the White House China's coordinator, on the US side, should do what former secretary of state Henry Kissinger did decades ago, and work out a de-escalation path, with the first step being reciprocal removal or reduction of tariffs.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 汉中市| 卓资县| 当涂县| 临西县| 黄骅市| 萨迦县| 贵德县| 小金县| 泌阳县| 宁明县| 吐鲁番市| 饶阳县| 陆丰市| 牙克石市| 新余市| 文山县| 怀远县| 和政县| 南涧| 绥芬河市| 龙门县| 汤原县| 密云县| 湛江市| 扎赉特旗| 赞皇县| 阿城市| 班戈县| 静乐县| 德安县| 景德镇市| 东方市| 泸州市| 通河县| 扎兰屯市| 衢州市| 长汀县| 镶黄旗| 甘孜县| 舟山市| 墨玉县| 遂溪县| 金华市| 石渠县| 石景山区| 永靖县| 丰顺县| 蒲城县| 曲松县| 盐城市| 龙海市| 新丰县| 遂宁市| 吉隆县| 陇川县| 新丰县| 邵武市| 安岳县| 黄梅县| 保德县| 景泰县| 莱州市| 绥德县| 四川省| 苗栗市| 乳山市| 同仁县| 贵定县| 拜城县| 吉木萨尔县| 远安县| 雷山县| 陆良县| 兴国县| 巴楚县| 平塘县| 宁国市| 和平区| 柘荣县| 陆良县| 伊通| 武山县|