男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Alibaba falls foul of its unfair practices: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-04-11 18:30
Share
Share - WeChat
FILE PHOTO: FILE PHOTO: The logo of Alibaba Group is seen at its office in Beijing, China on January 5, 2021. [Photo/Agencies]

Alibaba has achieved a great deal as an internet giant. But it has taken it for granted that it could use its market dominance to prohibit its rivals from developing in a fair manner.

But the other shoe dropped when the State Administration for Market Regulation levied 18.23 billion yuan ($2.8 billion) fine on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd for unfair competition through abusing its market dominant position.

Investigations by market regulators show that Alibaba has forced merchants to make a choice between the online market places of its own and those of its competitors.

By denying merchants the opportunity to use its online market places unless they do so exclusively, Alibaba believed that it could expand its market share and prohibit the development of its competitors.

However, China's anti-monopoly law stipulates that a company cannot prohibit merchants from doing business with its competitors without justifiable reason.

What Alibaba did violated the anti-monopoly law. In reality, what it was doing hindered free and fair competition of the online market, hurt the lawful rights of merchants and, as a result, caused damage to the interests of consumers.

The fine of 18.23 billion yuan ($2.8 billion) is a huge sum, but it represents only 4 percent of the company's total domestic sales in 2019, which was 455.712 billion yuan. The anti-monopoly law stipulates that a fine between 1 and 10 percent of a company's annual sales can be imposed on a company that has abused its market dominance.

Monopoly chokes the healthy development of a market economy causing it to stagnate. The abuse of market dominance will affect innovation in the platform-based internet economy and block the free flow of the essential factors of production.

The Chinese government strongly supports the development of the platform-based internet economy, but it does not mean it will not regulate this sector. In other words, free competition does not mean the big fish can eat the small fry and the market economy is not a jungle where the strong can use their strength to exclude their competitors.

China's market regulators have handled a series of cases involving unfair competition and monopoly in recent years. The case of Alibaba is only one of them.

What a company, be it an internet enterprise or one in any other sector, needs to do is to always innovate and do a better job itself. Only those companies which always aim to outperform their competitors can succeed in a fair market environment. That is the lesson other companies need to learn from the case of Alibaba.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 峨边| 北流市| 清原| 庆城县| 凤翔县| 房山区| 鲁山县| 河东区| 禄劝| 贵德县| 成武县| 垣曲县| 汝南县| 阿拉善左旗| 敖汉旗| 班戈县| 公主岭市| 葵青区| 沭阳县| 洛南县| 乌什县| 彩票| 枞阳县| 通许县| 嘉善县| 武强县| 克东县| 城口县| 施甸县| 通榆县| 密山市| 乌兰县| 如皋市| 吉林省| 江津市| 九寨沟县| 卢龙县| 开封市| 双峰县| 万山特区| 喀喇| 喀什市| 车致| 宜兰县| 上林县| 孝昌县| 天门市| 林周县| 德令哈市| 锡林浩特市| 舟曲县| 兴宁市| 太康县| 吉林省| 马龙县| 论坛| 中阳县| 济宁市| 南宁市| 开封县| 永顺县| 黑河市| 怀宁县| 定安县| 平舆县| 鸡东县| 宜昌市| 渝北区| 五台县| 滨海县| 灵武市| 容城县| 绍兴县| 文昌市| 基隆市| 闻喜县| 曲周县| 华亭县| 嘉义市| 昌乐县| 安丘市| 张家港市|