男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Newsmakers

Experts, readers speak out against unfounded reports of US media on lab leak hypothesis

Xinhua | Updated: 2021-07-05 11:11
Share
Share - WeChat
A staff member works in a laboratory in Wuhan, Central China's Hubei province, Feb 13, 2020. [Photo/Xinhua]

BEIJING - Against the evidence-free reports of some US media outlets on the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis, many experts and readers have spoken out, noting that the press coverage has only created a diversion from the real problems in the United States and chipped away at the media's credibility.

In a June 23 article on The Conversation, an online media outlet that publishes news stories and articles written by academics and researchers, Keith Grehan and Natalie Kingston of the University of Leeds said, "While a natural origin seems likely -- and many have long warned about the danger of wildlife circulating viruses -- scientists shouldn't jump to conclusions."

Noting a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report about the hypothesis, the researchers added, "The origin of Sars-CoV-2 may remain unresolved, but there is no evidence presented in the WSJ piece that scientifically supports the concept of a lab leak of a genetically engineered virus."

FAIR, a US media watch group, on Monday bashed the unfounded reporting. It is certainly true that people like former US President Donald Trump and former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo "are notorious for being shameless liars, and blatantly promoted the lab leak theory in a cynical attempt to scapegoat China for the US's disastrous handling of the pandemic," it said.

"Besides relying on unnamed officials," FAIR added, "another issue with the Journal report is that its lead author, Michael R. Gordon, co-authored (with Judith Miller) the notorious New York Times report ... that was perhaps the single piece of journalism most responsible for deceiving the nation about Saddam Hussein's imaginary weapons of mass destruction."

Professor Jeffrey D. Sachs of Columbia University published a commentary on the Project Syndicate on June 22, mentioning that the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has not yet revealed the actual research that it has financed and supported.

"It is in fact common knowledge in the US scientific community that NIH has indeed supported genetic recombinant research on SARS-like viruses that many scientists describe as GOFROC," the professor pointed out.

Added to this, the poor performance of the media and politicians has also let readers down. In a letter published Tuesday to the San Francisco Chronicle, a reader said, "In general, the treatment of the origins of COVID-19 by politicians and polemicists has ignored or distorted the science to the point of embarrassment for an advanced nation."

"Let us call on our politicians to end the China bashing and negotiate a framework for a peaceful and prosperous world," the reader said.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 昌黎县| 招远市| 溆浦县| 保山市| 塔城市| 常熟市| 克什克腾旗| 阿拉善右旗| 商城县| 乌拉特后旗| 侯马市| 永嘉县| 黔西县| 罗源县| 盈江县| 镇宁| 抚宁县| 阿拉善左旗| 宣威市| 徐闻县| 瓮安县| 库尔勒市| 望都县| 邢台县| 安义县| 津南区| 抚顺县| 红河县| 屏边| 安泽县| 陆丰市| 梓潼县| 墨江| 武汉市| 曲阜市| 筠连县| 江川县| 沂水县| 额尔古纳市| 开封县| 大港区| 墨竹工卡县| 大丰市| 济宁市| 泾阳县| 鄂尔多斯市| 黄平县| 鹰潭市| 调兵山市| 凤冈县| 新津县| 孟津县| 桦川县| 琼中| 咸丰县| 益阳市| 朝阳县| 丹巴县| 万载县| 禄丰县| 凤山市| 五寨县| 汕尾市| 香港 | 界首市| 蒙城县| 泗洪县| 衡山县| 孝感市| 清流县| 伊通| 昭通市| 桐城市| 喀喇沁旗| 淄博市| 象州县| 库伦旗| 宜君县| 南乐县| 栾城县| 永善县| 舞钢市|