男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Scientist group: Evidence shows coronavirus evolved in nature

By ZHAO HUANXIN in Washington | China Daily Global | Updated: 2021-07-07 11:33
Share
Share - WeChat
This undated transmission electron microscope image shows SARS-CoV-2, also known as novel coronavirus, the virus that causes COVID-19. [Photo/Agencies]

The virus that led to the COVID-19 pandemic evolved in nature, while suggestions of a laboratory-leak source "remain without scientifically validated evidence", a group of international scientists have written in The Lancet medical journal.

In a letter published on Monday, 24 physicians, veterinarians, epidemiologists, virologists, biologists, ecologists and public health experts from around the world continued to dismiss the lab-leak idea, as more recent, peer-reviewed studies strongly suggest that COVID-19 has a natural origin.

In February 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic, the same team of scientists wrote in a letter, also on The Lancet, saying: "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."

"Recently, many of us have individually received inquiries asking whether we still support what we said in early 2020," they wrote in a new letter titled "Science, not speculation, is essential to determine how SARS-CoV-2 reached humans".

"The answer is clear: we reaffirm our expression of solidarity with those in China who confronted the outbreak then, and the many health professionals around the world who have since worked to exhaustion, and at personal risk, in the relentless and continuing battle against this virus. Our respect and gratitude have only grown with time," the authors wrote.

The authors said their original letter was also intended to express their working view that SARS-CoV-2 "most likely" originated in nature and not in a laboratory.

This view was based on early genetic analysis of the new virus and "well-established evidence" from previous emerging infectious diseases, including the coronaviruses that cause the common cold as well as the original SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, they noted.

SARS-CoV-2 stands for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus that causes COVID-19 disease, while MERS is short for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, another viral respiratory illness.

As of Tuesday, the world has reported more than 183.9 million confirmed coronavirus cases, with the COVID-19 death toll nearing 4 million, according to the World Health Organization statistics.

"We believe the strongest clue from new, credible, and peer-reviewed evidence in the scientific literature is that the virus evolved in nature, while suggestions of a laboratory-leak source of the pandemic remain without scientifically validated evidence that directly supports it in peer-reviewed scientific journals," the new letter stated.

In March, the WHO released the origin-tracing study report of the China-WHO joint mission, drawing a conclusion that lab leak is "extremely unlikely".

In late May, US President Joe Biden called for a US-based probe into the origins of COVID-19. The administration gave US intelligence agencies 90 days to report whether the virus originated from an animal source or from a laboratory accident.

Almost a month later, the Biden administration officials cautioned that the 90-day review may not produce a "definitive" explanation as intelligence agencies take on the challenge of unraveling the global pandemic, The Wall Street Journal reported on June 27.

Beijing has strongly opposed the politicization of COVID-19 origin tracing, saying that it is a scientific issue, on which China has always maintained an open and transparent attitude.

The Lancet letter authors also said allegations and conjecture are of no help, as they do not facilitate access to information and objective assessment of the pathway from a bat virus to a human pathogen that might help to prevent a future pandemic.

"Recrimination has not, and will not, encourage international cooperation and collaboration," they noted.

"It is time to turn down the heat of the rhetoric and turn up the light of scientific inquiry if we are to be better prepared to stem the next pandemic, whenever it comes and wherever it begins," they wrote.

The authors are scientists from universities and institutes in countries including the US, UK, Germany, Spain, Italy, Australia, Malaysia, and China's Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 枣阳市| 图木舒克市| 二连浩特市| 泉州市| 麦盖提县| 电白县| 衡南县| 广州市| 青岛市| 武川县| 无极县| 会同县| 应用必备| 黄石市| 香格里拉县| 班玛县| 西畴县| 扎囊县| 永昌县| 黔西县| 黄大仙区| 洛南县| 如东县| 乌鲁木齐县| 松溪县| 织金县| 文化| 马龙县| 麻城市| 高雄市| 冀州市| 宣化县| 安福县| 古丈县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 兴业县| 盐边县| 黔江区| 临邑县| 来宾市| 建瓯市| 涟源市| 吉木萨尔县| 滦平县| 塔河县| 漠河县| 东港市| 汽车| 宽城| 安西县| 炎陵县| 松江区| 名山县| 四子王旗| 康马县| 门源| 通州市| 琼结县| 额敏县| 怀安县| 高碑店市| 平凉市| 黄浦区| 牟定县| 金寨县| 济宁市| 阳新县| 子长县| 长泰县| 锦州市| 东兰县| 富锦市| 金溪县| 苗栗县| 鞍山市| 淅川县| 花莲县| 古交市| 汾阳市| 斗六市| 宜阳县| 迭部县|