男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Pulitzer Prize winner slams US media for intentionally pushing lab-leak hypothesis on COVID-19

Updated: 2021-10-06 21:30
Share
Share - WeChat
A student of Montrara Ave. Elementary School has a COVID-19 test in Los Angeles, California, the United States, on August 16, 2021. [Photo/Xinhua]

LOS ANGELES - Despite mounting evidence that the COVID-19 reached humans through natural pathways, some mainstream US media organizations still pushed pseudoscience on the virus' origins, said an article in the Los Angeles Times.

In the column published on Sept 29, Michael A. Hiltzik, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, listed CNN, investigative news site the Intercept, and the Atlantic among such organizations, saying they downplayed or entirely ignored the latest scientific findings that support zoonotic theory and the view accepted by a preponderance of experts in virology.

In an hourlong documentary entitled "The Origins of COVID-19: Searching for the Source" aired on Sept 19 by CNN, both proponents of the zoonotic origin theory and supporters of the lab-leak theory had their times, but the former came from prominent virologic researchers and the latter had not any experience in this field.

"By posing these two theories as simply two equally plausible solutions to a mystery, CNN glosses over the fact that the virological community regards the animal origin as vastly more likely than a lab leak. In fact, the two hypotheses are miles apart in credibility," Hiltzik wrote.

Moreover, the 50-years-old news veteran noticed "much of the rest of the CNN program is filled with speculation about the Wuhan Institute, typically presented with portentous music on the soundtrack, suggesting subliminally that something sinister is going on there."

The reports from the Intercept and the Atlantic had similar intention and should not be trusted, he said, "by pretending that the debate itself is important, as if both sides have something to offer, they manage to report on a claim that has no substance."

Hiltzik concluded in this debate that the zoonotic camp had evidence and the lab-leak camp nothing to offer but innuendo.

"There is no evidence that the Wuhan lab was working with a bat virus that had anything but a very distant resemblance to SARS-CoV-2," he wrote.

Xinhua

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 曲沃县| 广安市| 民勤县| 定安县| 浠水县| 木兰县| 泰兴市| 榆中县| 遂川县| 天津市| 莱阳市| 稷山县| 池州市| 饶平县| 罗平县| 卢龙县| 廊坊市| 绥化市| 托克托县| 乌拉特前旗| 新邵县| 岑溪市| 方正县| 澜沧| 湖北省| 富蕴县| 湖南省| 夏河县| 乐山市| 威宁| 磴口县| 安平县| 扬中市| 平顺县| 丰城市| 香港 | 樟树市| 呼图壁县| 柯坪县| 淮北市| 苍山县| 吐鲁番市| 揭阳市| 靖州| 临城县| 松潘县| 同江市| 明溪县| 全州县| 汝阳县| 阆中市| 徐州市| 滁州市| 朔州市| 安平县| 腾冲县| 白河县| 平果县| 明光市| 和平县| 株洲市| 东光县| 治县。| 阜阳市| 安义县| 邵阳市| 连州市| 安丘市| 凌云县| 淳安县| 盐池县| 盐池县| 成安县| 兴仁县| 盐源县| 襄樊市| 吴忠市| 江陵县| 柳林县| 乡宁县| 罗源县| 汝城县|