男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Global development, global governance inextricably linked

By David Gosset | China Daily | Updated: 2022-09-23 06:50
Share
Share - WeChat
JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

Global governance, which is now at the heart of international relations, is linked to the history of globalization, but also to the geopolitical transformations that accompany it.

There are signs that attempts are being made by some countries to roll back globalization. These attempts should not, however, lead us to anticipate de-globalization, which would render futile moves to perfect the existing elements of global governance.

Globalization is complex. It is neither unidirectional nor unidimensional. It ebbs and flows depending on the nature of the relations between economies.

Technological advances that are combining to form what is described as a fourth industrial revolution are illustrative components of the complex nexus that is for the sake of convenience labeled globalization.

While forging ever deeper connections between peoples, globalization has also made evident problems that do not stop at borders. These transnational issues call for a more effective collective organization not a dismantling of the nexus.

Moreover, and this is fundamental to the solution to the problems, the awareness of belonging to the same human civilization has never been so strong and shared by peoples on all continents.

Power relations are a key determinant of global governance. Until the end of the 20th century, the global governance system was largely developed under the impetus of the Western world, and in particular the United States.

The Chinese renaissance and its accelerated development since it launched reform and opening-up in 1978 has profoundly changed the dynamics among countries. Globalization is intrinsically the process of de-prioritizing Western civilization in the global system, which is why Western countries are so resistant to the change.

The Global Development Initiative was put forward by Chinese President Xi Jinping at the 76th session of the United Nations General Assembly on Sept 21, last year. This articulates the process of change around four main priorities: the need to defeat COVID-19, the imperative to revive the global economy and promote global development, the duty to put into practice international relations marked by mutual respect and finally to improve global governance and practice true multilateralism.

Considered as a whole, Xi's speech delivered within the framework of the United Nations was a reaffirmation of China's commitment to multilateralism, but above all it was a call for countries to work together to usher in a fairer and more harmonious global system. It would be a mistake to underestimate the devastating effects on the international community of Donald Trump's populism, which for four years weakened the spirit of cooperation between nations.

It is because it is itself a reference in the field of development that China is able to formulate strategies that can serve other nations. From this point of view, it can be said that its influence will be proportional to its ability to achieve the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

The United Nations' 2021 Sustainable Development Goals Report estimates that more than 100 million people have been pushed back into extreme poverty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We can ignore it, or worse, pretend not to see it, and yet the urgency for action is clear. The Global Development Initiative tries to respond to this responsibly. The initiative also echoes principles that we must always bear in mind and which are clearly set out in founding declaration of the UN.

Chapter IX of the Charter of the United Nations, Article 55, reminds us that the members of the organization shall promote "higher standards of living, full employment and conditions of progress and development in the economic and social order". And, moreover, Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaims: "Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and his family, in particular for food, clothing, housing, medical care and necessary social services."

At the heart of the Global Development Initiative is the notion of a community with a shared future for mankind.

What is truly new in our times is not the bid to dismantle globalization, but the increasing complexity of the interconnectedness that makes up our world.

In this context, a paradigm shift is needed. If the problem of failed states remains, that is failure of the global governance system, that is to say an international community incapable of renewing its mechanisms of governance to support the development of all countries. That constitutes the major risk of our time.

It is to be hoped that we have the courage and reason not to let a tragedy occur which we know that cooperation could prevent. It is now that China, the European Union and the United States should set aside their differences and take the lead in putting the Global Development Initiative into effect for a better future for all.

David Gosset, a sinologist, is the founder of China-Europe-America Global Initiative (2021). He is the editor of China and the World in three volumes.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 曲阜市| 偃师市| 衡阳市| 富蕴县| 页游| 高要市| 台江县| 高雄县| 古交市| 鄂尔多斯市| 喀什市| 绵竹市| 渝北区| 远安县| 临江市| 永定县| 黔南| 资中县| 崇文区| 勃利县| 遂溪县| 宝应县| 手机| 毕节市| 雷州市| 镶黄旗| 阳新县| 吴忠市| 衡山县| 水富县| 深州市| 松原市| 建平县| 遂川县| 雷州市| 成都市| 新密市| 于都县| 辉南县| 福泉市| 五大连池市| 胶州市| 沾益县| 尉氏县| 子长县| 尚志市| 宜都市| 巨野县| 高州市| 上杭县| 永吉县| 精河县| 丹东市| 方正县| 乡宁县| 宣威市| 五河县| 凉山| 固始县| 汝南县| 桑植县| 天全县| 彭水| 廊坊市| 台山市| 平凉市| 台州市| 喀喇沁旗| 农安县| 嘉黎县| 兴海县| 和田县| 滨州市| 高邮市| 黄平县| 亳州市| 平谷区| 四平市| 桐庐县| 涟水县| 乃东县| 上高县|