男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Policies

Depriving nation of 'developing' status unfair

By Xu Xiujun | China Daily | Updated: 2023-07-31 09:28
Share
Share - WeChat
A view of Beijing's CBD area on Aug 19, 2022. [Photo/VCG]

As an attempt to hinder China's development, a United States Senate committee passed the "Ending China's Developing Nation Status Act" in June to strip China of its status as a developing nation in some international organizations and gain an upper hand in competition with the Asian power.

The US justifies its move by asserting that China has become the world's largest exporter and the second-largest economy, and therefore no longer meets the criteria of a developing country. But it is essential to note that Washington's relentless efforts are not driven by acknowledging China's developmental achievements. Instead, they aim to deprive China of the rights and privileges granted to developing countries by international organizations, exemplifying Washington's ongoing pursuit of hegemonic action in the international arena.

Complicated matter

In fact, currently, a universal formal standard for such classifications of countries does not exist. In practice, the World Bank designates the world's economies into four income groups — low, lower-middle, upper-middle and high — based on their gross national income per capita.

In addition, the United Nations Development Program further measures a country's development by its Human Development Index value, which is determined by aggregating the country's scores in a vast assortment of indicators, including life expectancy, literacy rate, GDP per capita, exports and imports and many more factors. HDI is divided into four tiers: very high human development (0.8-1.0), high human development (0.7-0.79), medium human development (0.55-0.7), and low human development (below 0.55). However, considering potential legal rights and obligations that may come along with classifications, the World Bank and the UNDP refrain from explicitly equating these categories with developing country status.

In order to better carry out comparisons and analysis, various international organizations, such as the UN Conference on Trade and Development, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, have compiled lists of countries and regions under different categories, including developed economies, emerging markets and developing economies.

Nevertheless, due to a lack of unequivocal standards and strict legal rigor, these criteria only hold statistical significance and cannot be used to define countries' rights and responsibilities under international law, let alone the fact that discrepancies frequently arise between different institutions regarding the classification of the same country or region.

When it comes to the framework of the World Trade Organization, with a member's identity often come the privileges it enjoys. WTO developing country members, for instance, benefit from more favorable conditions in terms of market access, regulations and obligations compared to their developed counterparts. However, the trade organization still does not possess a mechanism to distinguish between "developed" and "developing", and enables its member states to unilaterally declare their own national status.

Hence, while many international organizations utilize the concept of "developing country", a consensus on its exact definition remains elusive. No universally accepted international rules or agreements have been established to classify countries as "developed" or "developing". Therefore, determining a country's development status must be a collective endeavor of the international community, achieved through widespread consultation and consensus-building.

Largest developing country

The US' questioning of China's developing country status is merely based on overall trade and economic volume, deliberately overlooking the fact that the Asian country is home to a population of 1.4 billion.

Over the past few decades, China has witnessed significant advancements in economic and social development. However, when it comes to indexes such as GDP per capita, gross national income per capita, and resources and wealth volume divided by its population, the country not only falls short of internationally recognized standards for developed countries, but also lags behind some other developing economies.

Both the World Bank and the UNDP employ per capita criteria for country classification. According to the World Bank's classification, China currently falls into the category of upper-middle-income countries, with a considerable gap in per capita income when compared to high-income countries like the US.

The UNDP's Human Development Report 2021-22 ranks China 79th out of 191 countries and regions with its HDI standing at 0.768, signifying a high level of human development. However, among the 66 countries and regions classified as having achieved "very high" human development, there are still a few countries — such as Thailand, Serbia and Mauritius — that are recognized as developing countries by the international community.

Moreover, understanding China's stage of development should also avoid comparing its current status with the past situation of developed countries. For instance, decades-old infrastructure projects in developed countries, although once cutting-edge globally, now seem relatively outdated compared to similar contemporary infrastructure in China due to longer upgrade and renovation cycles. However, this should not be mistaken as a sign of inferior technological or managerial levels in developed countries. It is vital to acknowledge the disparities in wealth accumulation between China and developed economies and refrain from reaching hasty conclusions.

In a word, China has the right to engage in international activities, shoulder responsibilities and obligations and claim rights with an identity that aligns with its actual development status.

Unstoppable development

Although China's developing status remains unchanged, it has become a pivotal global power. As the world's second-largest economy, biggest trader in goods, second-largest outbound direct investor, largest holder of foreign exchange reserves and biggest tourism market, China has been a crucial player in global geopolitical and economic system.

Even though the US has increasingly intensified its efforts to impede China's modernization process in recent years, it turns out that the Asian power's development momentum remains robust and unstoppable.

Over the past decade, China's economy has recorded an average annual growth rate of 6.2 percent, surpassing the global average by 3.2 percentage points and outperforming emerging markets and developing economies by 2.2 percentage points. Its contribution to global economic growth has consistently exceeded 30 percent and has significantly surpassed the combined contribution of the Group of Seven member countries over the same period. And its growth is expected to continue outpacing that of most countries, solidifying its growing scale and importance within the global economy.

As an active player in the Global South, China has always aligned its interests with the collective interests of other developing countries. It keeps promoting reforms in the global system and pushing forward international political and economic stability by continuously reinforcing images of emerging markets and developing countries and advocating for international rule systems that favor their market access, competition, commodity pricing, trade settlements and technical standards.

Moreover, China's unique position in the international community allows it to serve as a bridge between developed and developing economies and balance the interests of large and small economies, thus becoming a powerful force driving common global development.

The writer is a senior fellow of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' National Institute for Global Strategy and the Institute of World Economics and Politics.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 阿拉善右旗| 温州市| 南和县| 上虞市| 凭祥市| 昌图县| 商都县| 金寨县| 土默特右旗| 霸州市| 昌江| 湟源县| 滨海县| 铅山县| 沙雅县| 阿克陶县| 准格尔旗| 汤原县| 古田县| 平江县| 武川县| 庄河市| 花莲市| 通辽市| 浦北县| 柳林县| 东山县| 三亚市| 临潭县| 林甸县| 武隆县| 固原市| 宿州市| 平江县| 临清市| 乌海市| 波密县| 平度市| 龙江县| 霍林郭勒市| 太湖县| 河东区| 德安县| 大理市| 隆化县| 颍上县| 福安市| 会泽县| 延安市| 澳门| 普格县| 洮南市| 赣榆县| 云林县| 九寨沟县| 苏尼特左旗| 绍兴市| 洛南县| 霍林郭勒市| 民丰县| 泗水县| 绥阳县| 伊通| 英吉沙县| 鄂托克前旗| 郴州市| 射洪县| 诏安县| 马边| 兴隆县| 乃东县| 丽水市| 呈贡县| 绥芬河市| 赫章县| 化德县| 郓城县| 兖州市| 长乐市| 石家庄市| 抚州市| 永春县|