男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Three myths about China proved wrong

By Dan Steinbock | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-21 07:32
Share
Share - WeChat
SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

During the year, some Western media outlets have attributed global inflation and deflation risk to China. More recently, the claim has been that China's economy is about to collapse. In reality, China's economic recovery will intensify in the second half of this year.

Information war is the new normal in international media. Contrarian voices are not just marginalized, but algorithm-excluded. Also, the line between ideologies and facts has blurred. The New York Times columnist Bret Stephens believes China's economy is on secular decline (Aug 29), just as he denies climate change and promotes neoconservative foreign policy.

The interest conflicts of some "opinion leaders" are obvious. The Hill's Peter St Onge, who declared that China has collapsed (Sep 13), is a fellow of the Heritage Foundation, a neoconservative think tank activist. Bloomberg interviewed as China expert Kyle Bass, who said "China's economy is "circling the drain" (Sep 11). Bass is a Texas-based investor and a member of several anti-China groups who has for years (unsuccessfully) used his hedge fund to bet against China and the yuan. His alleged stock manipulation has been scrutinized by US regulators and The Wall Street Journal.

Then there was the bizarre Newsweek story (Sept 5), suggesting Shanghai "has turned into a 'ghost town'" due to China's economic collapse. It built on a tweet by "independent journalist" Michael Yon, who cites a mystery "friend from China" to back up the claim.

Yon is a former member of "Special Forces" who reportedly spent more time "embedded with combat units" than any other journalist in Iraq and has popped up in destabilized targets ever since, including Hong Kong in 2019. In the past, his credibility has been challenged by US media and even the Pentagon.

In the past three quarters, the three media myths about China risks have been inflation, deflation and collapse. But what are the facts?

When China withdrew the COVID-19 prevention and control measures and began reopening its economy at the beginning of this year, international observers warned that the world's second-largest economy would become a "global inflation threat". There was a problem with the narrative. Numbers didn't back it up, as I showed in my op-ed in China Daily in March.

After the first quarter of the year passed, international pundits turned their earlier narrative upside down. When Chinese inflation rate was flat in June, these oracles claimed China was facing an impending deflationary crash.

But was China really a global deflation risk? That presumes that price levels in China reflect a sustained fall, and that such deflation is somehow exported worldwide.

In reality, the deflationary preconditions were not in place, as I showed in my op-ed in July. Then, I predicted that despite international headwinds, China's "rebound is strengthening… and economic recovery is likely to strengthen in the second half of the year".

Now that seems to be the case.

The better-than-expected economic data for August suggests that China's economic recovery is strengthening. On the supply side, the industrial value added recorded a 4.5 percent year-on-year increase. On the demand side, retail sales, a main gauge of consumption, beat expectations following the summer travel peak and consumption-boosting measures.

In the coming quarters, the rebound is likely to further strengthen on stimulus, including the increase in tax allowances. And early signs suggest that consumption recovery will accelerate during the upcoming National Day holidays.

The key issue for domestic recovery remains the ailing property market, though policymakers hope to restore consumer confidence in the sector through a reduced down payment ratio and a ceiling on new mortgage rates. These are steps in the right direction, but more needs to be done to stabilize the sector.

As recovery gathers pace in first-tier cities, policymakers also hope to see positive spillover effects in other cities and regions. Working-age jobless rates are at nearly the pre-pandemic level and rising incomes are boosting above-average deposit levels. Hovering at 20 percent, the rise of the youth unemployment correlates with the timing of the trade wars and geopolitics, which foster instability and uncertainty penalizing investment and hiring.

Supportive fiscal policies are needed, so is an accommodative monetary stance. On Friday, the People's Bank of China, the country's central bank, kept the interest rate unchanged but boosted liquidity through medium-term lending. Some said this is inadequate, yet the central bank can delay rate cuts because of strategic investments in the new economy, including electronics and software, electricity and railways infrastructure, and auto companies' rising capital input into electric vehicles whose sales are booming.

Moreover, the sharp, geopolitically-induced downturn in semiconductors may be bottoming out. And Huawei's impressive 5G Mate 60 suggests China is moving toward self-sufficiency in high-tech much faster than expected.

The challenging external headwinds reflect some moderation, for now. As long as the West's geopolitical unilateralism and protectionism continue, global demand is likely to remain sluggish weighing heavily on global recovery.

The eurozone is coping with recession, the United Kingdom is struggling under the disastrous impact of Brexit, the US economy is flirting with recessionary risks, and Japan's rising debt continues to maintain persistent stagnation and deflation. In contrast, China's growth could be anything between 4.5 percent and 5 percent this year. Given the US trade wars against and its geopolitical targeting of China, it would be an impressive achievement.

The author is the founder of Difference Group and has served at India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Centre (Singapore).

The opinions expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of China Daily and China Daily website.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 东海县| 图木舒克市| 宜宾县| 宜丰县| 普陀区| 高碑店市| 华坪县| 米脂县| 南和县| 武穴市| 浠水县| 深州市| 佳木斯市| 睢宁县| 新兴县| 岫岩| 固阳县| 晋宁县| 镇坪县| 临西县| 威宁| 比如县| 竹北市| 洮南市| 英吉沙县| 静宁县| 伊川县| 民丰县| 遂平县| 石景山区| 景洪市| 迁西县| 吉隆县| 塔河县| 比如县| 怀来县| 柳林县| 义乌市| 阿勒泰市| 诸暨市| 洮南市| 丁青县| 祁门县| 杭锦旗| 通辽市| 汝州市| 临安市| 衡南县| 晋州市| 扎兰屯市| 巫溪县| 康乐县| 陕西省| 库尔勒市| 孙吴县| 集贤县| 确山县| 诸城市| 衡山县| 依安县| 大洼县| 威信县| 禹州市| 鞍山市| 新龙县| 揭西县| 兴隆县| 文登市| 万年县| 定结县| 延长县| 新和县| 临湘市| 汉源县| 武定县| 津市市| 天津市| 镇坪县| 蒙阴县| 湖南省| 盐池县| 任丘市|