男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
China
Home / China / National affairs

Judicial accuracy spotlighted as court revises 'Breaking Bad' drug case rulings

By Cao Yin | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-01-23 23:27
Share
Share - WeChat

A Chinese court's decision to revise the ruling in a drug case involving a former associate chemistry professor — dubbed the "Chinese version of Breaking Bad" — reflects the country's commitment to enforcing the law accurately and demonstrating a strong stance against drug crimes, a senior prosecutor said.

Hu Yaoxian, a prosecutor from the Supreme People's Procuratorate, China's top prosecuting body, made the remarks after the Hubei High People's Court overturned its previous judgment against a group of former chemistry professionals.

According to a statement released Thursday by the China National Narcotic Control Committee, the high court issued a new ruling in December after a retrial, finding Yang Zhaohui, Zhang Zhengbo, Bao Junxi, and Feng Jing guilty of smuggling, selling, transporting, and manufacturing drugs.

The court resentenced Yang and Zhang to life imprisonment and 15 years in prison, respectively, and upheld earlier sentences of eight years each for Bao and Feng.

In May 2023, the same court had sentenced Yang and Zhang to 13 years and 11 years in prison, respectively, but at the time, all four were convicted of illegal business operations, the committee said.

Prosecutors in Hubei challenged the ruling, arguing that the convictions and sentences were legally flawed and too lenient. In September 2023, they sought a review from the Supreme People's Procuratorate, according to JCRB.com, a news outlet under the procuratorate.

Hu emphasized that Chinese law explicitly defines drugs as narcotic and psychotropic substances regulated by the state that can cause addiction. He noted that the substances produced and sold by the four defendants were under state control and classified as drugs.

"The revised ruling aligns with the law," Hu said, adding that the changes in conviction and sentencing serve to rehabilitate the defendants, educate them on the societal harm caused by their actions, and deter future offenses.

He said the case sends a broader warning to the public that no one can illegally handle narcotic or psychotropic substances controlled by the state, reinforcing the principle of legal compliance.

"The prompt correction of the earlier flawed judgment highlights the accurate implementation of the law and underscores the nation's strict judicial policy on drug crimes," Hu said.

Chinese media previously reported that Zhang, a former associate chemistry professor at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, was a leading manufacturer of new psychoactive substances.

This case is a significant typical case of crimes involving new psychoactive substances in China. The defendant, Zhang Zhengbo, due to his special status as an associate professor, has been hyped as the "Chinese version of Breaking Bad," attracting widespread public attention.

Zhang and Yang, a former classmate, established a chemical company registered as a producer of pharmaceutical intermediates. However, they manufactured methcathinone and sold it in the United States and Europe disguised as ordinary chemical products.

The committee said Zhang and his employees were apprehended in June 2015. Investigators found that between January 2014 and June 2015, Zhang, Yang, Bao, and Feng produced and sold more than 110 kilograms of psychotropic drugs under state control.

In March 2017, the Wuhan Intermediate People's Court convicted the four of smuggling, selling, transporting, and producing drugs. Yang was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve, Zhang received life imprisonment, and Bao and Feng were each sentenced to 15 years in prison.

The defendants appealed, and in April 2018, the high court sent the case back to the Wuhan court for retrial.

In June 2019, their sentences were reduced, but the original convictions were upheld. The latest ruling in December marks a significant legal correction in a high-profile case.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 霍山县| 衡水市| 县级市| 关岭| 巴彦淖尔市| 越西县| 房山区| 石屏县| 诏安县| 泸定县| 龙游县| 岐山县| 武乡县| 德州市| 彭阳县| 汶上县| 连城县| 吴川市| 普定县| 通渭县| 海林市| 九江县| 炎陵县| 广昌县| 屯留县| 毕节市| 泰宁县| 庆云县| 布尔津县| 普格县| 望江县| 曲麻莱县| 大邑县| 九龙城区| 桐庐县| 泰和县| 安龙县| 化德县| 即墨市| 武夷山市| 隆昌县| 三门县| 涞源县| 邹城市| 河津市| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 偏关县| 老河口市| 鸡泽县| 修水县| 偃师市| 新河县| 扬州市| 宜君县| 沭阳县| 洛宁县| 信阳市| 延安市| 定州市| 金阳县| 堆龙德庆县| 抚顺县| 临西县| 邯郸县| 广河县| 乳山市| 南华县| 山西省| 新绛县| 西华县| 云南省| 嵊州市| 汕头市| 蒲江县| 襄垣县| 固阳县| 北川| 曲靖市| 古丈县| 当涂县| 准格尔旗| 错那县|