男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / To the Point

Winners and losers of a controversial US bill

By GUO PING | China Daily | Updated: 2025-07-04 09:19
Share
Share - WeChat
The US Capitol stands behind a US flag on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, US, June 29, 2025. [Photo/Agencies]

US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending proposal, commonly known as the "Big Beautiful Bill", was awaiting a vote on Wednesday in the House of Representatives after its passage by the narrowest of margins the day before in the Senate.

The House, which narrowly passed the bill last month, now needs to approve the Senate's changes to the bill before it can head to Trump's desk for his signature prior to the July 4 deadline.

The final showdown over the key legislation — which is expected to bring massive changes to taxes, federal spending and regulatory policies — comes following weeks of intense infighting within the Republicans and strong opposition from the Democrats and some business leaders such as Tesla CEO Elon Musk. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Wednesday that every single Democrat will "vote hell no" against the policy package, which he called "one big ugly bill".

One big controversy surrounding the package is that it contains $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would allow the country's richest to get the largest share, yet to make up for the lost revenue, federal funding on healthcare and food aid programs for the poor would be reduced by more than $1.3 trillion in the coming decade. This has prompted critics to question the erratic logic for wealth redistribution, which basically means taking from the country's poorest to give to the richest.

Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Meanwhile, changes to federal nutrition assistance are set to strip millions of the poorest Americans of their access to food. Which partly explains why the bill is highly unpopular among US citizens. A survey by The Washington Post found that 42 percent of Americans opposed the bill, with only 23 percent supporting it.

That the controversial bill is being rammed through Congress despite strong opposition underscores the polarization between the Republican and Democratic parties, which makes bipartisan compromise totally impossible. This has also contributed to widespread disillusion among US citizens about the country's ability to address the most pressing challenges that it faces nowadays in a timely way, given that under such a system the interests of the donors to a political party can often precede the interests of the nation and the majority of citizens who lack the wherewithal to promote their interests.

One thing about the bill that seems to have upset opponents such as Musk the most is that its regulatory changes, rather than trying to embrace industries of the future, instead seek to promote industries of the past. The "Big Beautiful Bill" will dramatically roll back tax incentives designed to boost the electric vehicle industry and clean energy projects fueled by renewable sources such as wind and solar, while seeking to enhance domestic coal, oil and gas development.

While this conforms to Trump's belief that clean energy tax credits are part of a "green new scam "that only helps the "globalist climate agenda", it obviously runs counter to the long-term interests of not only the US but also the world. These changes could kill jobs in future-focused industries and stifle innovation, as Musk observed, calling the legislation "utterly insane and destructive".

Moreover, the legislation would increase federal deficits by nearly $3.3 trillion over the next decade, exacerbating a problem that could cause greater economic risks and aggravate the country's financial woes. The US government for the first time spent more than $1 trillion last year on interest payments for its nearly $36 trillion national debt, which means the country is now spending more on net interest payments than on national defense and Medicare. The deficit-to-GDP ratio also worsened to 6.3 percent last year, much higher than the 3 percent that is considered "sustainable".

The skyrocketing interest costs have been attributed to Washington's "insatiable appetite for borrowing and spending". It is estimated that interest costs will consume more than 20 percent of the nation's revenue by 2034.

Before taking office, Trump promised to "restore fiscal sanity to our nation". The "Big Beautiful Bill" belies that pledge.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 伊宁县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 灵宝市| 通城县| 蓝田县| 彩票| 秦安县| 嘉黎县| 昔阳县| 长沙市| 察隅县| 文水县| 青州市| 泸西县| 天祝| 平安县| 灵丘县| 赤城县| 昌黎县| 遂平县| 庄浪县| 龙门县| 维西| 林芝县| 武穴市| 德清县| 安西县| 宽城| 蓬莱市| 邵东县| 萝北县| 电白县| 枣阳市| 米脂县| 阜平县| 济源市| 沁水县| 察隅县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 平遥县| 通道| 大埔区| 浦北县| 平安县| 济源市| 靖江市| 平度市| 双桥区| 日土县| 红桥区| 达日县| 黄龙县| 泸溪县| 稻城县| 安龙县| 紫金县| 广灵县| 宜君县| 长沙县| 玛多县| 道孚县| 贵南县| 三江| 溧阳市| 深州市| 绥棱县| 扶风县| 衢州市| 宜兰县| 交城县| 吴堡县| 南阳市| 图木舒克市| 石阡县| 平顶山市| 攀枝花市| 玉田县| 囊谦县| 三门峡市| 汝州市| 于都县| 溧阳市|