男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / To the Point

Winners and losers of a controversial US bill

By GUO PING | China Daily | Updated: 2025-07-04 09:19
Share
Share - WeChat
The US Capitol stands behind a US flag on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, US, June 29, 2025. [Photo/Agencies]

US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending proposal, commonly known as the "Big Beautiful Bill", was awaiting a vote on Wednesday in the House of Representatives after its passage by the narrowest of margins the day before in the Senate.

The House, which narrowly passed the bill last month, now needs to approve the Senate's changes to the bill before it can head to Trump's desk for his signature prior to the July 4 deadline.

The final showdown over the key legislation — which is expected to bring massive changes to taxes, federal spending and regulatory policies — comes following weeks of intense infighting within the Republicans and strong opposition from the Democrats and some business leaders such as Tesla CEO Elon Musk. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Wednesday that every single Democrat will "vote hell no" against the policy package, which he called "one big ugly bill".

One big controversy surrounding the package is that it contains $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would allow the country's richest to get the largest share, yet to make up for the lost revenue, federal funding on healthcare and food aid programs for the poor would be reduced by more than $1.3 trillion in the coming decade. This has prompted critics to question the erratic logic for wealth redistribution, which basically means taking from the country's poorest to give to the richest.

Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Meanwhile, changes to federal nutrition assistance are set to strip millions of the poorest Americans of their access to food. Which partly explains why the bill is highly unpopular among US citizens. A survey by The Washington Post found that 42 percent of Americans opposed the bill, with only 23 percent supporting it.

That the controversial bill is being rammed through Congress despite strong opposition underscores the polarization between the Republican and Democratic parties, which makes bipartisan compromise totally impossible. This has also contributed to widespread disillusion among US citizens about the country's ability to address the most pressing challenges that it faces nowadays in a timely way, given that under such a system the interests of the donors to a political party can often precede the interests of the nation and the majority of citizens who lack the wherewithal to promote their interests.

One thing about the bill that seems to have upset opponents such as Musk the most is that its regulatory changes, rather than trying to embrace industries of the future, instead seek to promote industries of the past. The "Big Beautiful Bill" will dramatically roll back tax incentives designed to boost the electric vehicle industry and clean energy projects fueled by renewable sources such as wind and solar, while seeking to enhance domestic coal, oil and gas development.

While this conforms to Trump's belief that clean energy tax credits are part of a "green new scam "that only helps the "globalist climate agenda", it obviously runs counter to the long-term interests of not only the US but also the world. These changes could kill jobs in future-focused industries and stifle innovation, as Musk observed, calling the legislation "utterly insane and destructive".

Moreover, the legislation would increase federal deficits by nearly $3.3 trillion over the next decade, exacerbating a problem that could cause greater economic risks and aggravate the country's financial woes. The US government for the first time spent more than $1 trillion last year on interest payments for its nearly $36 trillion national debt, which means the country is now spending more on net interest payments than on national defense and Medicare. The deficit-to-GDP ratio also worsened to 6.3 percent last year, much higher than the 3 percent that is considered "sustainable".

The skyrocketing interest costs have been attributed to Washington's "insatiable appetite for borrowing and spending". It is estimated that interest costs will consume more than 20 percent of the nation's revenue by 2034.

Before taking office, Trump promised to "restore fiscal sanity to our nation". The "Big Beautiful Bill" belies that pledge.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 汉沽区| 蒲江县| 绥化市| 千阳县| 石柱| 肇州县| 启东市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 桂林市| 临邑县| 贵南县| 肥乡县| 广汉市| 双柏县| 宜阳县| 广河县| 宝坻区| 泰州市| 塔河县| 古丈县| 泸州市| 长春市| 兴安盟| 临城县| 中方县| 霸州市| 和田县| 闽侯县| 浮山县| 仪陇县| 云林县| 隆林| 南岸区| 岳普湖县| 夏河县| 苏尼特右旗| 工布江达县| 甘谷县| 江口县| 临沂市| 洮南市| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 新平| 互助| 灵武市| 江阴市| 会昌县| 堆龙德庆县| 赤城县| 亚东县| 治县。| 崇义县| 图木舒克市| 九龙城区| 洛隆县| 永昌县| 遵化市| 元朗区| 儋州市| 高阳县| 香河县| 石城县| 固始县| 仙游县| 太湖县| 安溪县| 金华市| 靖远县| 乐东| 金溪县| 科技| 平舆县| 石城县| 左贡县| 盖州市| 武强县| 安吉县| 德阳市| 香格里拉县| 都兰县| 渭源县| 安陆市|