男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Motoring

Li Auto misfire signals deeper troubles

Crash test video aired during i8 launch goes viral for all the wrong reasons and is followed by abrupt change to trim levels

By LI FUSHENG | China Daily | Updated: 2025-08-11 09:24
Share
Share - WeChat
Li Auto's i8 pure electric SUV on display in a shopping mall in Zhuhai, Guangdong province, on Aug 7. [Photo provided to China Daily]

Li Auto had hoped to stage a comeback in China's crowded pure electric vehicle market with the launch of the i8 SUV in late July. This comes after the fiasco of its first electric car, the Mega MPV, launched in March 2024.

Now the company, known for extended-range plug-in hybrids, is mired in a backlash that highlights broader strategic and reputational challenges to the once high-flying automaker.

The controversy centers on a dramatic crash test video shown at the i8's unveiling. In the footage, the SUV collides head-on with an 8-ton truck, sending the larger vehicle airborne and almost separating its cab from the trailer, while the i8 appears intact, its airbags deployed, and battery system undamaged.

The clip quickly went viral — but not in the way Li Auto intended. Critics questioned the credibility of the test, noting that a light passenger vehicle causing such extensive damage to a fully loaded truck defies typical crash physics.

Many observers dismissed the stunt as "sensationalist", accusing Li Auto of relying on emotionally charged imagery to stand out in an increasingly competitive EV segment.

"This wasn't a safety demo — it was marketing theater," said a Shanghai-based automotive analyst who declined to be named.

The situation escalated when Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, the manufacturer of the truck used in the test, issued a public statement condemning what it called a "scenario that misleads the public and damages the brand".

Usually, if a product of another company is used in such tests, its logo, name or any other information is concealed. This was not the case in the i8 crash test, for unknown reasons.

Some Li Auto executives initially adopted a combative tone, expressing willingness to repeat the test.

But the company and the China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, which conducted the test, later moved to ease tensions.

Both issued statements clarifying that the test was intended solely to demonstrate the i8's passive safety performance, with no intent to disparage the truck brand.

The i8 launch also became the subject of ridicule for another reason: a wooden table presented proudly onstage by CEO Li Xiang.

He touted it as a useful feature for passengers to dine on or children to do homework during road trips.

Social media users quickly drew mocking comparisons between Li's table and the more high-tech reveals by rivals Nio and XPeng, whose executives showcased in-house microchips at their product launches.

In the days that followed, short videos began circulating online showing Li Auto vehicles occupying multiple parking spots or blocking entrances, further souring public sentiment. Though unrelated to the product itself, the clips fueled a narrative of poor brand image and low-class customers.

The backlash has placed Li Auto in a precarious position. The company has been under pressure to regain momentum after the all-electric Mega MPV failed to resonate with buyers despite heavy promotion. The futuristic styling of the Mega proved divisive, with some praising its aerodynamic credentials but others claiming it resembled a hearse.

The i8 was intended to relaunch its pure EV ambitions. On paper, it offers solid credentials, including a high-voltage platform and family-focused features.

One week after launch, Li Auto abruptly consolidated the i8's three trims into a single "Max" variant saying that it was "surprised" that a big proportion of its users placed orders on the variant so it decided to "follow their advice".

While some users welcomed the move, which effectively offers a 20,000-yuan ($2,780) discount, analysts said it reflected hasty decision-making and unclear product positioning. They added that the so-called decision to follow users' advice was nothing but a price cut in disguise to boost sales.

"They're reacting to the market in real time, but it shows a lack of strategic foresight," said one auto consultant who wanted to remain anonymous.

Behind the theatrics lies a more sobering reality: China's new energy vehicle landscape is evolving rapidly.

The advantages that once fueled Li Auto's rise — its extended-range hybrids, family-centric branding, and early bet on the smart cockpit — are no longer enough to guarantee growth.

Statistics show that Li Auto sales stood at 30,700 units in July, down 39.7 percent year-on-year and down 15.3 percent from June.

Competitors such as Nio's sub-brand Onvo are quickly gaining ground with lower priced, better-integrated EV offerings.

There were posts on social media claiming that Li Auto sales representatives told prospective Onvo L90 buyers that the i8 is now cheaper than a week ago, encouraging them to return for a test drive and promising to offset the deposit they paid for the L90.

Investor sentiment has echoed that shift. Li Auto's shares tumbled more than 12 percent in Hong Kong the day after the i8 launch, though they recovered slightly following the price cut.

Some analysts remain optimistic about the company's strong brand recognition and loyal user base. Others view the i8 rollout as symptomatic of internal mismanagement; a lack of critical voices around the table that might have questioned the value of the crash video or the logic of the product trim strategy.

Still, the i8 is not without merit. It represents a technological step forward and Li Auto retains a sizable following among China's urban middle-class families.

If the company can avoid further setbacks and better align marketing with its engineering, Li Auto may yet secure a position in China's fast-changing EV hierarchy. But to do so, the company must recalibrate its marketing approach, and — above all — let its products speak louder than theatrics.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 安丘市| 乌鲁木齐市| 寻乌县| 光泽县| 盘山县| 汪清县| 阳城县| 宝鸡市| 淮安市| 水富县| 陇南市| 宣武区| 淮滨县| 广昌县| 繁昌县| 子长县| 巴马| 长汀县| 赫章县| 惠州市| 衡阳县| 沙湾县| 西吉县| 太仓市| 东辽县| 许昌市| 广昌县| 克什克腾旗| 五寨县| 宣化县| 三台县| 宝山区| 阆中市| 栖霞市| 社会| 清丰县| 黄石市| 佛坪县| 泰顺县| 定远县| 双桥区| 凌云县| 邹平县| 千阳县| 衡南县| 梁山县| 寻乌县| 光泽县| 石河子市| 含山县| 吴川市| 遂川县| 渭南市| 买车| 西乌| 乌鲁木齐县| 常德市| 北川| 淄博市| 南京市| 阿图什市| 镇坪县| 榆树市| 永川市| 河间市| 涟水县| 中山市| 大竹县| 金沙县| 伊宁市| 广平县| 正镶白旗| 夹江县| 娄烦县| 麟游县| 武宁县| 井陉县| 新源县| 鹤岗市| 临夏县| 福建省| 丁青县|