男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Motoring

Credibility test as customers challenge Xiaomi

By LI FUSHENG | China Daily | Updated: 2025-08-18 10:14
Share
Share - WeChat

Xiaomi Corp's breakneck entry into China's competitive and fast-growing electric vehicle market is hitting a reputational speed bump.

The smartphone maker-turned-EV upstart is drawing a backlash from buyers over aggressive payment demands and misleading product claims, threatening to dent momentum after a record-setting launch year.

Since late July, Xiaomi has been demanding full payment for its SU7 Ultra sedan and YU7 SUV weeks or even months ahead of delivery, breaking sharply with industry norms, which typically require the balance only upon handover.

Customers are complaining on social platforms such as Xiaohongshu (RedNote) that they have been warned their "orders will be suspended or canceled from production" unless payment is made within a week of the notice, even when delivery is five to six months away, and their deposits of 20,000 yuan ($2,785) will not be refunded.

Many accuse Xiaomi of lacking contractual integrity, noting that in 2024 public Q&As for its first model, the SU7, the company explicitly stated buyers could settle the balance after inspecting the vehicle at delivery centers.

The payment row comes on the heels of a backlash over false promotional claims about the SU7 Ultra's dual-duct hood.

In May, an owner of the SU7 Ultra's 42,000-yuan carbon-fiber "dual-duct" hood discovered by accident that it lacked functional ventilation, which Xiaomi claimed it did. This soon resulted in widespread complaints.

Xiaomi offered partial compensation — 20,000 loyalty points or an aluminum replacement — but declined full refunds, stoking anger.

One buyer, surnamed Gao, posted a snapshot last week on the Sina Weibo micro-blogging platform of a WeChat exchange with Xiaomi Auto Vice-President Li Xiaoshuang. It showed Li's May promise of a "satisfactory solution" had gone unanswered.

"When you said you wanted to solve the issue," Gao wrote, "did you mean solving our problem, or solving your company's problem?"

Criticism has also focused on founder Lei Jun, whose warm, user-focused stage persona contrasts with what some see as silence on contentious issues.

While Lei remains active on Weibo, his car-related updates have centered on soliciting advice about renaming the YU7 Standard trim to "Pro" or "Max" to sound more appealing, rather than addressing consumer complaints.

"Our Standard trim is not an entry trim. It is more powerful than rivals' Pro or Max. Should we call it Pro or Max as well?" he wrote in one post.

Analysts note that Xiaomi's automotive milestones remain formidable; over 300,000 EVs delivered within 15 months, and the YU7 racking up more than 200,000 orders within three minutes of launch.

But they warn that sustaining momentum will hinge on restoring trust. Without that, they say, the flood of buyers could just as quickly turn into an exodus.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 和田市| 昌都县| 梁山县| 来凤县| 绿春县| 建平县| 嘉兴市| 扎囊县| 九寨沟县| 会同县| 周口市| 百色市| 兖州市| 雷州市| 新竹市| 兴海县| 项城市| 巴林左旗| 高青县| 禹城市| 孟津县| 龙陵县| 丹棱县| 宕昌县| 台东县| 会同县| 曲水县| 巩义市| 武乡县| 济源市| 天等县| 灵丘县| 恩平市| 汉中市| 恭城| 周至县| 卢龙县| 溧水县| 江华| 丽江市| 屯昌县| 北京市| 武定县| 祁阳县| 娄烦县| 稷山县| 盘山县| 绥江县| 冀州市| 民丰县| 凤城市| 赣榆县| 贞丰县| 泌阳县| 鄢陵县| 云龙县| 麻阳| 江达县| 柘城县| 阜阳市| 新泰市| 南宫市| 桂林市| 金坛市| 临武县| 寻甸| 盖州市| 宝山区| 汨罗市| 桐庐县| 东港市| 临泉县| 舟曲县| 安西县| 观塘区| 舞钢市| 乡宁县| 苗栗县| 新疆| 和政县| 颍上县| 德格县|