男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Berlin's China policy review should aim for objectivity and pragmatism

By LI YANG | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-11-11 07:58
Share
Share - WeChat
A view shows containers at a loading terminal in the harbour in Hamburg, Germany, July 13, 2025. [Photo/Agencies]

The German government's plan to reexamine its trade policies toward China through the establishment of a parliamentary expert committee shows its awareness that its China policy needs some changes.

The initiative — which will assess Germany's trade relations with China in areas such as energy, raw material imports and investment in critical infrastructure — is indicative of the broad common interests of the two major economies.

It is hoped that this move will enable the Friedrich Merz government to grasp the cooperative and mutually beneficial nature of Sino-German relations, and lead to a more rational, coherent and pragmatic China policy.

For decades, China and Germany have maintained a strong economic partnership built on mutual respect and shared benefits. From 2016 to 2023, China was Germany's largest trading partner and data from January to August this year show China has overtaken the United States to regain that position. While this underscores that the foundation of Sino-German cooperation remains solid, Berlin's recent policy debates risk undermining that foundation.

The current wave of skepticism toward China in Germany is driven less by genuine economic realities and more by shifting political narratives — particularly those influenced by Washington's tariff war with Beijing, the ongoing Ukraine crisis and the European Union's "de-risking" rhetoric targeting China. While it is natural for Germany to assess its economic risks, such assessment must not be driven by exaggerated concerns or external political pressure.

German Chancellor Merz's recent remarks calling for protectionist measures to defend Europe's steel industry, and Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul's statements about systemic competition with China, signal a worrying departure from Germany's traditional free-trade principles and will only harm the competitive strength of German industries that have long benefited from cooperation with China. Moreover, Wadephul's mischaracterization of China's policies, including some of his irresponsible remarks on the Taiwan question, risks eroding mutual trust and damaging the political atmosphere necessary for sustained cooperation.

China and Germany may differ in their historical experiences, cultures and social systems, but that should not be an obstacle to better trade ties. As Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi emphasized during his recent phone call with Wadephul, at the request of the German side, the key lessons from the development of China-Germany relations are mutual respect, win-win cooperation and partnership positioning. Both sides should enhance communication and dialogue, dispel misunderstandings, and avoid "microphone diplomacy" and groundless accusations.

Wang's message carries an important reminder that China has always supported Germany's reunification and Berlin, having experienced the pain of national division, is expected to understand and support China's efforts to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity. The one-China principle therefore remains the cornerstone of political trust between the two sides.

The new expert committee that it plans to set up is expected to provide the Merz government with more valuable and objective reference on a long-term consistent direction of Germany's China policy. It is advised that Germany should demonstrate its due independence in policymaking, rather than being influenced by external factors.

Berlin should review its China policy with a mindset guided by facts rather than ideology, and cooperation rather than confrontation. That will be conducive to the healthy development of Sino-German relations along a path of mutual respect, mutual benefit and shared progress.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宁安市| 伊通| 临洮县| 阳春市| 江达县| 高台县| 桂阳县| 东海县| 都安| 阿瓦提县| 蓬安县| 平果县| 耒阳市| 镇安县| 金川县| 松滋市| 台北市| 饶河县| 砀山县| 巨野县| 仁怀市| 老河口市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 内江市| 沙田区| 稷山县| 贺州市| 柘荣县| 蓬安县| 榆树市| 宣恩县| 元阳县| 维西| 五寨县| 牡丹江市| 福安市| 嘉兴市| 兰西县| 湘乡市| 张掖市| 青海省| 新泰市| 临高县| 西丰县| 崇左市| 广宗县| 阳春市| 马公市| 新民市| 木兰县| 富裕县| 普陀区| 石台县| 南岸区| 永新县| 买车| 辛集市| 监利县| 开原市| 禄丰县| 杭锦后旗| 黄大仙区| 南乐县| 台山市| 正宁县| 大埔区| 玉溪市| 剑川县| 宁远县| 哈巴河县| 手游| 白朗县| 大关县| 大新县| 昌图县| 富源县| 云浮市| 疏勒县| 拉孜县| 九龙城区| 库车县| 临西县|