男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Comment

HK's swift response to Tai Po fire in stark contrast to Grenfell Tower blaze probe

By XING YI | China Daily | Updated: 2025-12-11 00:00
Share
Share - WeChat

The tragedy of the Tai Po fire in Hong Kong, which claimed more than 150 lives, offers a point of reference for the United Kingdom. There the call for justice in another deadly fire remains unanswered after years of delay and a lengthy legal process.

On June 14, 2017, a fire fuelled by highly flammable cladding engulfed Grenfell Tower in London, killing 72 residents. In the aftermath, the then UK prime minister, Theresa May, launched a public inquiry to determine the facts behind the tragedy and prevent a similar disaster from happening again.

May said she was determined to ensure justice for all the victims and insisted that "we cannot wait for ages" to learn the lessons. Yet nearly a decade later, many of those pledges remain unfulfilled. The bereaved families left waiting are increasingly angry and frustrated.

Despite a 1,700-page report finally being published in September 2024, no one has yet been arrested, prosecuted or held accountable. Though the UK's Crown Prosecution Service said it has been working closely with the Metropolitan Police Service, it will not take a decision on who to charge for the fire before the end of 2026.

According to a report in The Guardian, survivors of the Grenfell fire have condemned the lack of accountability as "a deep and bitter injustice", noting that many of the officials criticized in the inquiry continue to work in related fields.

This prolonged process has eroded public trust and made many feel that the inquiry has become more a mechanism for managing public anger than actually delivering justice. At this year's anniversary of the tragedy, the vice-chairman of Grenfell United, representing the survivors of the tragedy and bereaved families, branded the disaster a "forgotten scandal".

The contrast between the required urgency and the sluggish pace of the work offers an important lesson for Hong Kong. While the circumstances differ, the societal imperative is the same: swift, transparent and uncompromising accountability.

This is why Hong Kong's response to the Tai Po fire is worth mentioning.

First, the Hong Kong Fire Services Department, together with law enforcement agencies, moved quickly to investigate the cause of the fire, and 13 people have already been arrested for suspected manslaughter.

Second, Hong Kong's Independent Commission Against Corruption has set up a task force to probe possible corruption in the grand renovation project of Wang Fuk Court, detaining 12 individuals, including consultants, subcontractors and middlemen.

Third, John Lee Ka-chiu, chief executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, announced last week that he will invite a judge to lead an independent committee tasked with conducting a comprehensive review of the building works system and recommending reforms to prevent similar tragedies.

"Yes, we need a reform. Yes, we have identified failures at different stages," Lee said at a news conference. "That is exactly why we must act seriously to ensure that all these loopholes are plugged, so that those who are responsible will be accountable and the shortcomings will be addressed."

Without doubt those responsible for manslaughter or corruption will not be spared. With major renovation works currently underway in many residential buildings across Hong Kong, people are relieved to see the SAR government making devoted efforts to find out what happened and what needs to be improved.

It is imperative that the independent committee identify, as quickly as possible, the systemic causes behind the fire and press the government to implement reforms without delay.

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 济源市| 诸城市| 石棉县| 丘北县| 包头市| 万全县| 北票市| 建水县| 曲阜市| 崇信县| 比如县| 永靖县| 富民县| 安图县| 阿克| 关岭| 靖西县| 乾安县| 天津市| 文昌市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 琼中| 上犹县| 嘉黎县| 图木舒克市| 丽江市| 苏尼特左旗| 宜兰县| 高平市| 广德县| 黄山市| 潜江市| 淅川县| 商都县| 延庆县| 湄潭县| 大宁县| 沈阳市| 左权县| 应城市| 巴南区| 茶陵县| 临潭县| 高邑县| 张家川| 两当县| 盖州市| 山阴县| 永寿县| 宁远县| 新蔡县| 循化| 金川县| 宝兴县| 宝山区| 台州市| 灵武市| 故城县| 太仓市| 平昌县| 扎鲁特旗| 泸州市| 元谋县| 贵德县| 永平县| 崇义县| 铁岭县| 舞阳县| 苍南县| 巴南区| 大石桥市| 莒南县| 津南区| 浦江县| 汤原县| 保靖县| 峨边| 吉木萨尔县| 红安县| 文成县| 甘谷县| 乡城县|