男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Shoemakers to suffer EU anti-dumping hit

By Diao Ying (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-12-19 09:49

The vast majority of Chinese footwear manufacturers will most likely not file suit against an anti-dumping tariff from the European Union as the deadline for litigation draws near, partly due to what would be expensive, lengthy legal battles.

Related readings:
 Trade: Europe deficit with China hits new high
 Firms prepare for EU rules on chemical goods imports
 China economy status deal might help EU
 Ministry of Commerce backs shoemakers' EU lawsuits

The European Union has imposed a 16.5 per cent anti-dumping tariff on leather shoes imported from China since October 7. Over 1,200 shoemakers were effected, though only four are fighting back through lawsuits in the EU courts.

Two of these firms are Zhejiang-based enterprises, including Aokang Group, the largest privately owned footwear manufacturer, and Taima Shoes Group, the third-largest shoe firm in the province. They are joined by two Guangdong-based companies: Golden Step Industrial Co Ltd and Xinsheng Gangyuan Shoes Group.

Guo Weiwen, an official with another Guangdong-based company, Apach Footwear, said that most small- and medium-sized enterprises are trying to work around the tariffs.

"Most enterprises turn to other strategies such as adjusting product structure and changing their export market," she said. "Some of them even plan to recede from the EU market."

Wang Xuehua, a lawyer specializing in anti-dumping with the Beijing Huanzhong Law Firm said that the high cost, complicated legal procedures, and unpredictable result of suing has stopped most enterprises from filing.

The legal procedure to counter anti-dumping charges can be very time consuming, and "it is possible that the two-year period will come to an end before the investigation is completed," said Wei Yafei, a spokeswoman with the China Leather Industry Association.

The four bigger players that are suing, however, feel they have a case.

"The European Union's action does not follow the rules of the World Trade Organization and the convention of the industry," said Liao Yue, chairman of Taima, one of the companies taking legal action. "They imposed tariffs on us without investigating my company."

The two Guangdong enterprises that decided to file the suit, according to Guo of Apach, were "the sample enterprises chosen by the European Union during the investigation, so they have experience in dealing with legal issues."

Shoemaker Aokang said it already handed its litigation materials to the European court in Brussels and are waiting for reaction.

"We hope we can learn something from this case, and we need to gain some experience for other enterprises in the future," said Wei Kaimeng, a spokesman with Aokang.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)



主站蜘蛛池模板: 镇安县| 罗平县| 确山县| 万年县| 南宫市| 东丽区| 西安市| 大冶市| 昌吉市| 兴海县| 开原市| 长宁县| 祁门县| 石屏县| 塔河县| 尤溪县| 扬中市| 蒙城县| 汉源县| 开江县| 黔江区| 伊宁县| 托克逊县| 镇江市| 闻喜县| 岢岚县| 平果县| 治县。| 揭西县| 汝州市| 弥勒县| 桃源县| 同仁县| 突泉县| 永登县| 手游| 盐源县| 宣威市| 玛纳斯县| 西和县| 绥宁县| 沈丘县| 双辽市| 宜兰市| 岳阳市| 连云港市| 玛沁县| 海安县| 双柏县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 涞水县| 郎溪县| 黎平县| 乌拉特前旗| 随州市| 淮阳县| 罗平县| 恭城| 上思县| 仙游县| 松原市| 突泉县| 平南县| 曲沃县| 五指山市| 乐清市| 巴马| 安平县| 湘乡市| 高邑县| 蓬莱市| 两当县| 隆安县| 株洲市| 宁武县| 盘锦市| 泸水县| 聊城市| 平度市| 莫力| 肇源县| 泸州市|