|
BIZCHINA> Editor Choice
![]() |
|
Related
Ambush marketing hurting sponsors
By Liu Jie (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-07-10 18:24
According to the report, global market and research firm The Nielsen Company exclusively offered for China Daily, the majority of Chinese consumers, or 73 percent of the respondents, would be more likely to purchase or use a brand if it was an Olympic sponsor. "The good news for official sponsors is that in spite of there being more than 60 of them battling it out, along with a host of competitor campaigns, some sponsors have been successful in cutting through the advertising clutter to establish their Olympic connection in the minds of consumers," said Richard Basil-Jones, managing director of Media Asia-Pacific of The Nielsen Company. The company gauged the consumer perception of Olympic sponsors and competitor brand endorsement, advertising and creative strategies in an online survey, conducted between May 19 and 25. It surveyed a total of 12,549 and is a representative of the Chinese population. When consumers were asked to identify which brands were Olympic sponsors from a list of both sponsor and non-sponsor brands, a high level of consumers chose China Mobile, Lenovo and Coca-Cola. 82 percent of those surveyed recognized that China Mobile was an official sponsor, 67 percent identified Lenovo and 63 percent pointed to Coca-Cola. At the same time, non-sponsors have not been slow to get in on the act, incorporating sports-related themes or athletes in their advertising, designed to establish a connection between their brands and the Games. Non-sponsor Nike - competitor to official sponsor Adidas - has taken advantage of arguably the most famous Chinese athlete, hurdler Liu Xiang, for its advertising, while Liu Xiang appears concurrently in advertising for sponsors Coca-Cola, Visa, Lenovo, Haier and Yili. "The Nielsen survey found that non-sponsor activity is succeeding in creating some confusion in the minds of consumers, and while Yili, with 57 percent awareness, appears to be heading off non-sponsor Mengniu, at 37 percent awareness. Adidas faces a significant challenge from non-sponsor Li Ning, with identifying rates of the two at 34 percent and 29 percent respectively," said Basil-Jones. Besides Li Ning, competitor brands receiving the most incorrect Olympic associations were China Unicom and Pepsi, with 25 percent and 18 percent awareness respectively, although levels of association were far below that of the sponsors in their respective product categories. Worldwide Olympic partnerships are also no guarantee of consumer recognition in the Chinese market, with awareness for Visa, Johnson & Johnson, McDonald's and Samsung all registering at around the quarter to one-third marks. (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 贵州省| 济宁市| 湘乡市| 昭平县| 上蔡县| 安丘市| 新绛县| 巴青县| 德庆县| 宁武县| 富源县| 和硕县| 鸡泽县| 龙游县| 诸暨市| 浦城县| 肥西县| 东海县| 山西省| 玉溪市| 武夷山市| 乳源| 桃园县| 东安县| 霍州市| 兴安县| 师宗县| 乌审旗| 湖州市| 宜都市| 天长市| 阿拉善右旗| 兴城市| 邵阳县| 锡林浩特市| 平原县| 延边| 轮台县| 孟州市| 义乌市| 福安市| 河津市| 朝阳市| 夹江县| 紫金县| 九龙坡区| 曲沃县| 文安县| 连城县| 东阳市| 东安县| 遂川县| 泰来县| 鄂尔多斯市| 库伦旗| 宣威市| 江源县| 宁武县| 岗巴县| 蛟河市| 大新县| 阿勒泰市| 江西省| 西和县| 萍乡市| 都昌县| 崇州市| 清新县| 津市市| 左云县| 富川| 武胜县| 扎兰屯市| 玛曲县| 尚志市| 汕头市| 江源县| 增城市| 青岛市| 宁安市| 广丰县| 滨州市|