|
BIZCHINA> Review & Analysis
![]() |
|
Check SOE leaders
(China Daily)
Updated: 2009-07-16 13:45 Chen Tonghai, former general manager and chairman of board of directors of China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (Sinopec), more than deserves the death sentence with a two-year reprieve that was announced yesterday. The total he received in bribes is close to 200 million yuan ($29 million).
The amount of bribe is not necessarily the sole benchmark for punishment. The core issue is whether the way power was abused by corrupt leaders like Chen will help identify and plug the loopholes in our system. Chen earned himself notoriety for arbitrary and despotic exercise of power. He behaved as if he was the king of the State-owned petroleum giant. His whim was policy. He was famously quoted as saying, "The 1 or 2 million yuan I spend in socializing a month is a piece of cake compared with the more than 20 billion yuan our firm brings to the State in taxes every year. You can't make money unless you know how to spend it".
With corrupt leaders being nabbed one after another, few would question the resolve of the central authorities in fighting corruption. However, the fact that increasing numbers of them are being arrested in successive years suggests that the crackdown has failed to serve as a deterrent. And, neither has the supervisory mechanism improved to the point of effectively preventing abuse of power. The latest stipulations by the central committee of the Communist Party of China on honest and clean management by SOE leaders for the first time explicitly specify what they can't do on their position. The document stipulates SOE leaders cannot decide their own compensations without permission from higher authorities.
However, stipulations alone cannot be expected to stop officials from abuse of power. Some of SOE leaders will quite probably invent ways to circumvent the rules, regulations and restrictions that act as checks and balances. So we need to further improve the supervisory mechanism to make it impossible for them to do so. Chen's case shows what we really need is effective supervision and transparency. How to institutionalize these is what matters. (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 恩平市| 于都县| 沿河| 桓台县| 阳高县| 酒泉市| 白沙| 淮阳县| 沙洋县| 澜沧| 泰州市| 邻水| 武邑县| 克什克腾旗| 东至县| 横峰县| 衡南县| 东源县| 遵义市| 六枝特区| 永和县| 阿合奇县| 桂平市| 呼图壁县| 东平县| 武山县| 突泉县| 信宜市| 岳阳市| 泽普县| 彰武县| 桐柏县| 民权县| 齐河县| 宁乡县| 鸡东县| 鸡泽县| 息烽县| 茂名市| 和顺县| 邓州市| 安龙县| 张家港市| 泗水县| 上杭县| 樟树市| 建始县| 景洪市| 曲水县| 峡江县| 金寨县| 英吉沙县| 岚皋县| 师宗县| 遂川县| 青海省| 上林县| 都匀市| 石台县| 西城区| 高清| 涞水县| 安福县| 灵璧县| 汶上县| 福鼎市| 阳新县| 漯河市| 金坛市| 潜山县| 准格尔旗| 镇原县| 汾阳市| 东丰县| 元阳县| 永修县| 万山特区| 南宫市| 沂源县| 开江县| 晋城| 左权县|