|
BIZCHINA> Top Biz News
![]() |
|
US distributors deny Chinese tires disrupted market
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-08-08 13:27
Representatives of American tire distributors told officials from the Office of US Trade Representative (USTR) at a hearing Friday that China-made tires do not compete directly against US-made products in the North American market. They further pointed out an increase on trade tariff against low-cost Chinese tires will cause more job losses in the US and additional outlay for American consumers.
"They tell me 'we got out of that business and we are not going back'," Mayfield said. Mayfield said for the past 15 years, major US producers had focused on higher profit and better performing tires instead of what industry insiders call "tier three tires" that serve lower end and second-hand automobiles. He said that led distributors like him to look for foreign suppliers in order to cater the niche market at the bottom of the pyramid, separated from the higher end market that US manufacturers are after. The ITC proposal to activate a three-year duty hike against Chinese made "tier three tires" is the result of a petition brought by the US Steelworkers Union (USW) which represents workers at large US tire manufacturers. USW's petition was based on Section 421 of US Trade Act of 1974, which allows the US government to take punitive action if imports of a product from China are determined to "cause or threaten to cause market disruption to the domestic producers." Representatives from USW argued at Friday's hearing that "a flood" of Chinese import from 2004 to 2008, an increase of 215 percent by volume, caused 5,100 US job losses as tire plants closed down. But Mary Xu, deputy secretary general of the China Rubber Industry Association, told the panel that increase in Chinese tires import to the US is modest. It grew 2 percent in 2008 over volume from 2007. The general trend in 2009 was declining before the threat of a 55 percent hike in tariff triggered a recent surge. US tire distributors estimate Chinese tires occupy roughly 15 percent of the US market. Members from the government panel that includes officials from the USTR, the State Department and the Labor Department, said an important point in deciding the up-or-down vote on the ITC recommendation is the impact of possible job losses caused by the decision. Thomas Prusa, professor of economics at Rutgers University, testified if high tariff made import of Chinese tires non-profitable, thus unattractive to US distributors, for every job saved or recreated at a US tire factory, a dozen to 25 jobs in the distribution sector could be lost due to the elimination of the import business and the decline in sales and tire installation jobs caused by higher cost of tires. Prusa believes the ITC ruling narrowly focused on job losses in the US tire industry, but lacks consideration of an overall impact to the US economy. Furthermore, he estimates US consumers would have to pay $600 million to $700 million extra per year for the more expensive US made tires if American manufacturers decided to return to that market. No major American tire makers or auto makers, the tire industry's biggest client, supports the ITC decision. The USTR must submit a policy recommendation to the White House by September 2 on whether or not to impose the tariff. US President Barak Obama has 15 days after that to give a final ruling. This decision, Mr. Obama's first on a US-China trade dispute, comes one week before he hosts Chinese President Hu Jintao in Pittsburg for the G-20 meeting in September. (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 卫辉市| 酒泉市| 延寿县| 彭阳县| 晴隆县| 顺昌县| 怀化市| 阜宁县| 滨海县| 绍兴市| 靖边县| 塔城市| 中方县| 宁晋县| 会宁县| 衡东县| 无锡市| 大关县| 南乐县| 丽水市| 台湾省| 赤水市| 香港 | 靖江市| 梨树县| 专栏| 博乐市| 滕州市| 水富县| 永昌县| 宁德市| 资溪县| 衡阳市| 玉树县| 凌云县| 大方县| 都兰县| 宁南县| 铅山县| 清涧县| 庆云县| 台东市| 日照市| 东丽区| 绥江县| 河西区| 临漳县| 余姚市| 财经| 囊谦县| 东城区| 且末县| 合川市| 峨眉山市| 镇原县| 西青区| 德格县| 南开区| 嘉定区| 贺州市| 静安区| 连平县| 广元市| 和政县| 汉川市| 筠连县| 叶城县| 泸州市| 丰县| 潮安县| 晋州市| 治多县| 叙永县| 嵊州市| 楚雄市| 涿州市| 尼勒克县| 溧水县| 黄浦区| 中西区| 改则县| 英吉沙县|