男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Make me your Homepage
left corner left corner
China Daily Website

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23
By Mark Williams (China Daily)

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

(China Daily 12/13/2012 page9)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

 
 
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宝兴县| 开阳县| 英德市| 望都县| 格尔木市| 乌鲁木齐县| 静安区| 昌平区| 郸城县| 思茅市| 平利县| 台北县| 香港| 漠河县| 崇左市| 贵溪市| 乡宁县| 石门县| 句容市| 开原市| 松滋市| 成安县| 饶平县| 芜湖市| 潍坊市| 卢龙县| 新疆| 长白| 木里| 高尔夫| 广州市| 鞍山市| 临沧市| 陇南市| 夹江县| 沾益县| 彭州市| 大余县| 鞍山市| 保康县| 济宁市| 林甸县| 会昌县| 江陵县| 博爱县| 平凉市| 贵港市| 庆安县| 大石桥市| 子长县| 观塘区| 金湖县| 儋州市| 双柏县| 抚松县| 石城县| 莒南县| 玛多县| 平遥县| 平安县| 嵩明县| 新邵县| 南京市| 阿拉尔市| 顺平县| 察隅县| 余姚市| 巴彦县| 稷山县| 钟山县| 安宁市| 玛纳斯县| 汤原县| 虎林市| 凤凰县| 根河市| 唐海县| 肥乡县| 昌都县| 洛宁县| 阿拉善左旗| 泾源县|