男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Industries

The white elephant in the room

By Zheng Yangpeng | China Daily | Updated: 2013-09-05 00:50

Study shows excessive infrastructure investment negatively impacts economy

Whether China's largely State-driven infrastructure construction is excessive is always a topic subjected to vehement debate at home and abroad. A recent study offered a new clue to the answer.

The study, commissioned by the Shanghai-based SIFL Institute and led by two researchers with the Antai College of Economics and Management of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, touched upon the issue by comparing China's infrastructure investment with its private productive capital.

The white elephant in the room

According to experts, it is reasonable for China to adopt an "infrastructure going ahead" strategy in its go-west campaign. The problem, however, is the breakneck infrastructure investment pace has not been followed with industrial investment growth, primarily led by the private sector.[Cai Zengle / for china daily]

The study is built upon an assumption that there is an optimal allocation between the infrastructure investment and private productive capital. Any deviation from the balance leads to efficiency losses, thereby resulting in losses in GDP.

Huang Shaoqing and Shi Hao analyzed China's investment data during 1985 and 2011. In their calculation, infrastructure includes electricity, gas, water, transportation, warehousing and postal, water conservancy, environment and public utilities and information transmission. The remainder is counted as private productive capital.

The study found the largest loss occurred in 1997, when infrastructure investment was severely inadequate, causing losses amounting to 2.58 percent of GDP that year. This means that factor input could have generated more GDP if infrastructure and private productive capital went hand-in-hand.

Since 1998, the government has ramped up infrastructure investment by issuing bonds. The loss because of insufficient infrastructure investment has been gradually alleviated. In 2003, the cost was reduced to 0.64 percent of GDP that year.

The trend, however, has reversed since 2003. From 2003 to 2008, costs resulting from excess infrastructure investment in economically underdeveloped regions and insufficient investment in most developed coastal economies kept rising, reaching 1.31 percent of GDP in 2008.

At the end of 2008, China decided to roll out a large-scale stimulus package to avert the contagion effect of the global financial crisis. In the following two years, much of the credit spree flooded the infrastructure sector.

In other words, the infrastructure spending spree happened at a time when infrastructure in most regions was already over-built. Hence, the ratio of GDP losses has steadily risen from 2008's 1.31 percent all the way up to 2011's 1.85 percent — 872.4 billion yuan ($135.3 billion).

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 巴彦县| 二连浩特市| 高密市| 泗洪县| 阳朔县| 巴青县| 宜君县| 萨嘎县| 阿瓦提县| 扬中市| 望奎县| 通江县| 泰和县| 红河县| 岳普湖县| 淮阳县| 双城市| 兴安县| 蒙山县| 澎湖县| 进贤县| 庆城县| 五莲县| 固始县| 通江县| 讷河市| 开江县| 阳曲县| 平舆县| 赞皇县| 桂东县| 石家庄市| 咸丰县| 永德县| 安新县| 濉溪县| 葫芦岛市| 四平市| 宣化县| 剑川县| 泌阳县| 阿拉善右旗| 桑植县| 龙江县| 东兴市| 邯郸市| 浦县| 镇沅| 怀来县| 余干县| 怀安县| 虞城县| 舟山市| 黄浦区| 徐汇区| 怀仁县| 彭山县| 理塘县| 泸水县| 东山县| 任丘市| 隆昌县| 河津市| 海门市| 卫辉市| 贵溪市| 长岛县| 赤城县| 许昌市| 湟中县| 门头沟区| 滕州市| 山丹县| 石泉县| 门源| 醴陵市| 大宁县| 河南省| 新疆| 咸宁市| 富宁县| 临高县|