|
BIZCHINA> News
![]() |
|
Impasse over iron ore continues
By Jiang Wei (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-06-26 08:15
Before Baosteel, on behalf of China's steel industry, took part in the negotiations with international miners in 2003, Chinese steelmakers were not as concerned about the iron ore prices as today. Since 2005, the industry has been arguing that, as the world's largest iron ore importer, China deserves a bigger say in the negotiations with Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton and Vale on annual iron ore pricing. However, iron ore prices jumped over 71 percent in 2005 and by another 70 percent in 2008. This year, Japanese and South Korean firms have accepted a 33 percent cut on last year's price. Though the China Iron and Steel Association (CISA) is still seeking a "China price", a 40 percent cut in the price of iron ore from Australia, many feel that the industry's weakness has been exposed through the negotiations. Experts attribute the industry's weak stance in negotiations to the low industrial concentration of the country's steel industry. In the negotiations, buyers are too scattered, compared with the Big Three suppliers who control over 70 percent of global iron ore trade, said Mei Xinyu, researcher with the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, affiliated to the Ministry of Commerce. "It is tough to form a joint force among buyers of different countries and in China due to the large number of players," he said. Despite the CISA banning steelmakers from making individual contracts with suppliers, there have been reports of small mills signing agreements with foreign miners. A number of steel mills in Shanxi province have reportedly signed long-term contracts with foreign miners for this year's iron ore supply last week shortly after 35 Chinese mills signed supply contracts involving 50 million tons of imports with Vale. Mei added the industry also made some controversial policies, which helped strengthen the buyers' position in talks. Increasing the tax rebates on steel exports has boosted China's demand for iron ore. The Japanese and South Korean mills can afford a higher price for iron ore imports than Chinese players as many of them own shares in some Australian miners and can still make profit with the 33 percent price cut this year.
He explained that most Chinese mills lack long-term shipment agreements and are hence exposed to the sea freight price ups-and-downs. Since the benchmark price was inked by Japanese and South Korean mills last month, sea freight from Brazil and Australia to Chinese ports have increased $24 and $5 per ton respectively. Its influence on steel mills' costs is larger than the around $6 gap between a 40 percent and 33 percent price cut, Zeng said. He suggested that Chinese mills must learn from their Japanese rivals who are largely reliant on long-term iron ore supplies but sign annual shipment contracts for them at the same time. (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
||||||
主站蜘蛛池模板: 孝义市| 兴仁县| 牡丹江市| 新巴尔虎右旗| 新乡县| 洪江市| 永吉县| 响水县| 蓝田县| 藁城市| 邵武市| 湖南省| 晋州市| 惠安县| 田东县| 遂宁市| 东辽县| 宿松县| 沁阳市| 云梦县| 屏东县| 泾川县| 南岸区| 东乡县| 伊金霍洛旗| 临高县| 烟台市| 广灵县| 呼伦贝尔市| 遂宁市| 林西县| 阳高县| 正镶白旗| 如皋市| 扎兰屯市| 兰西县| 宝鸡市| 台前县| 应城市| 大同市| 四平市| 吉安市| 三门县| 班玛县| 库伦旗| 靖江市| 开封市| 咸丰县| 石河子市| 安溪县| 齐齐哈尔市| 白河县| 福泉市| 会同县| 清新县| 株洲县| 日照市| 志丹县| 济南市| 桂林市| 陵川县| 靖江市| 弋阳县| 舞钢市| 宣汉县| 达拉特旗| 南安市| 定南县| 奉化市| 木兰县| 西安市| 南充市| 安平县| 张掖市| 广平县| 邳州市| 舞钢市| 平远县| 云浮市| 峡江县| 邹城市| 甘德县|