男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
BIZCHINA> IPR Issue
Music companies shift IPR tactics
By Wu Jiao (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-11-11 10:25

The country's first copyright infringement lawsuits against singing machine producers and sellers have been filed in Beijing No 2 Intermediate People's Court, officials with the court said on Friday.

Relatedreadings:
Music companies shift IPR tacticsKaraoke piracy crackdown stirs mounting debate
Music companies shift IPR tactics Warner sues karaoke hall for infringement
Music companies shift IPR tactics Karaoke bars may pay for music
Previously, music organizations tended to sue KTV clubs. Some analysts see the shift to suing producers and sellers of singing machines as a potential new trend to combat copyright infringement.

The Music Copyright Society of China (MCSC) sued Xiamen-based Amoi Electronics as the company's PK-DVD 680 singing machines were sold to the market containing 20 songs that had not been copyrighted by the MCSC. The society is demanding Amoi pay 49,000 yuan (US$6,100) in compensation.

Music companies shift IPR tactics
An outlet of Cashbox KTV in Shanghai. [newsphoto/file]
Music companies shift IPR tactics
The MCSC is also suing sellers of the PK-680 singing machine for compensation.

The case is still under investigation and the date of the first hearing has not been decided, said Gao Zhihai, an employee of the court.

Meanwhile, the court received a case in which Beijing-based children's music agent Kirin Kid Productions sued Changzhou-based Shinco Electronic Group Co, Ltd as its DG-900 singing machine contained copyrighted songs. Kirin Kid demanded 59,000 yuan (US$7,573) in compensation.

Wang Xuemei, market manager with Kirin Kid Productions told China Daily the two companies have already settled out of court.

Wang would not reveal the exact amount of compensation Shinco will pay.

The two cases are believed by legal experts to signal a new trend in IPR protection campaigns.

According to a judge surnamed Zhang in charge of IPR infringement cases, copyright holders used to prefer to sue KTV owners for IRP infringement.

But their lawsuits often failed as KTV owners claimed the singing machines had come with the songs preloaded, according to Zhang.

Legal experts such as Zhang expect the implementation of KTV copyright fees will ease the tension between copyright holders and music broadcasters.

The National Copyright Administration (NCA) said on Thursday that KTV club owners should pay a daily 12 yuan (US$1.5) copyright fee for each singing room. The decision came after a two-month soliciting of opinions from copyright holders, KTV goers and owners.

The fee programme will start in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou before going national, according to a notice posted on the official website of the NCA.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
主站蜘蛛池模板: 资兴市| 黑龙江省| 邵武市| 古交市| 拉萨市| 南川市| 改则县| 杂多县| 梁平县| 珲春市| 天台县| 平安县| 安远县| 安多县| 顺义区| 乌兰浩特市| 鄂托克旗| 黄大仙区| 商都县| 昌邑市| 翼城县| 绥江县| 满洲里市| 卓尼县| 梅河口市| 贵定县| 伊宁市| 萍乡市| 新丰县| 城口县| 抚宁县| 岢岚县| 高碑店市| 沙田区| 铜川市| 绩溪县| 泗阳县| 潞西市| 正镶白旗| 金昌市| 五河县| 秀山| 临猗县| 凤冈县| 余庆县| 宁南县| 宜宾县| 宜章县| 筠连县| 丹巴县| 来宾市| 江都市| 陵川县| 民和| 炉霍县| 泗洪县| 大渡口区| 余姚市| 龙门县| 昌都县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 同仁县| 乐东| 呼图壁县| 富锦市| 饶阳县| 丹阳市| 调兵山市| 鸡西市| 怀柔区| 镇远县| 安远县| 永靖县| 兴安县| 渭源县| 盘锦市| 桦南县| 化州市| 本溪| 甘洛县| 阜康市| 荔波县|