男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Trademark body sued in latest Wahaha-Danone twist

By Wang Zhenghua (China Daily)
Updated: 2007-09-01 11:04

The legal wrangle between Danone and Wahaha has spread beyond the two companies to the nation's trademark authority.

Hangzhou Wahaha Foods Co, one of five joint ventures set up by the two firms, has sued the Beijing-based State Trademark Bureau over what it claims was "improper administrative behavior" in 1996 and 1997.

Related readings:

 Lawyers divided over Wahaha deal
 Wahaha in troubled waters Ministry denies intervening in Danone, Wahaha dispute Wahaha lays into Danone

Special Coverage:
Wahaha vs Danone 

H angzhou Wahaha Foods is 51 percent-owned by French food giant Danone Groupe SA, with the rest controlled by China's largest drinks producer Wahaha Group.

The Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court told China Daily on Friday that Wahaha Foods has demanded the trademark bureau rescind its rejection of applications to transfer the Wahaha brand from the Chinese company to the joint ventures because it did not issue a written notice or give a reason for its decisions at the time. The court has accepted the case.

A spokesman with the trademark bureau said on Friday that it has yet to be notified of the legal action by the court. Danone declined to comment on the matter.

Danone, the world's largest yogurt maker, signed an agreement with Wahaha in 1996 that required the transfer of the Wahaha brand from the Chinese company to the joint ventures.

Under the contract, the Chinese company was barred from making products that compete with those produced by the joint ventures, or from using the Wahaha brand without Danone's consent.

But the two parties are divided on the validity of the agreement after Wahaha Group opposed an acquisition proposal from Danone to take 51 percent of non-joint ventures set up by the Chinese side.

Zong Qinghou, founder of Wahaha Group, claims the transfer was not properly approved by the authorities, citing a reply from the State Trademark Bureau, which twice rejected applications for the transfer of the Wahaha brand in 1996 and 1997.

Wahaha claims Danone was aware of the situation and that the two sides had joined forces to get around the rules.

Danone initially said Wahaha had not applied properly for the transfer of the brand, for which Danone paid Wahaha Group 100 million yuan (US$13.25 million).


(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)



主站蜘蛛池模板: 木里| 武鸣县| 徐州市| 喀喇| 辉南县| 沅江市| 南岸区| 安泽县| 视频| 五常市| 灵武市| 闽侯县| 勐海县| 奈曼旗| 搜索| 论坛| 曲沃县| 东阳市| 民勤县| 高雄市| 若尔盖县| 郧西县| 迁西县| 连云港市| 武威市| 彭州市| 三都| 苗栗县| 永靖县| 丰城市| 玉树县| 深泽县| 邢台县| 青田县| 诸城市| 淮南市| 赤峰市| 南江县| 富锦市| 韩城市| 松滋市| 平和县| 修文县| 桦南县| 大余县| 济源市| 个旧市| 汕尾市| 郯城县| 灵丘县| 元谋县| 道真| 鄂尔多斯市| 屯昌县| 武安市| 云阳县| 葵青区| 松溪县| 宽甸| 万源市| 鄢陵县| 阳江市| 随州市| 兰州市| 沂南县| 台中市| 利川市| 吉首市| 武定县| 崇文区| 理塘县| 桂东县| 邻水| 太湖县| 如东县| 宁蒗| 启东市| 满城县| 綦江县| 顺平县| 岳阳市| 海口市|