男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
BIZCHINA> Center
Danone to fight on after verdict
By Tuo Yannan (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-08-06 08:55

Danone to fight on after verdict

In response to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court ruling in favor of Wahaha's right to its trademark, Danone Group yesterday said it will pursue all legal options to protect its contractual rights and financial interests.

Wahaha spokesman Shan Qining said: "What we want to say to Danone's statement is only one sentence: 'We respect the decision of the court and we respect the law.'"

Hangzhou-based Wahaha Group had earlier said the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court had rejected Danone's appeal of Hangzhou arbitration commission's ruling in favor of Wahaha in a dispute over the ownership of the Wahaha trademark.

The Wahaha spokesman said the ruling was a key development in its prolonged dispute with its French partner, and should have a positive impact on another dispute that is now before an arbitration commission.

Danone Group argued that the Hangzhou arbitration commission's ruling had "distorted the facts of the case, intentionally and maliciously misinterpreted and misapplied the laws of the People's Republic of China, and was an award that completely ignored the facts and law".

Danone had also said it hoped the Hangzhou court would carry out the substantive review, apart from the procedural review, of the legality of the arbitral procedures.

In its latest statement, Danone said: "The Hangzhou court only carried out a procedural review for this case (specifically, the Hangzhou court failed to conduct a substantive review of the accuracy and legality of the determination of facts and application of law) and rendered its ruling based on a procedural review only."

Although the Hangzhou court ruling is final, Danone said it would report the matter to the appropriate superior judicial authorities in China. It also said the arbitration proceedings in Stockholm would begin hearing in January.

Last year, Danone filed its first lawsuit against Wahaha on May 9 in Stockholm, and on June 4, Danone filed another lawsuit in Los Angeles against two Wahaha-related companies and two individuals.

Since 2006, the two companies have filed numerous complaints and lawsuits against each other under various Chinese and foreign jurisdictions.

Danone, which owns a 51 percent stake in 39 Danone-Wahaha joint ventures, has accused Wahaha of setting up independent companies and selling products identical to those sold by the joint ventures. Danone had demanded a 51 percent stake in the non-joint-venture companies, which Wahaha rejected.

 


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)

 

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 仁怀市| 大丰市| 同德县| 凌源市| 长岭县| 连平县| 商都县| 米易县| 兴义市| 昌都县| 泾源县| 新干县| 马龙县| 米易县| 云霄县| 西吉县| 新邵县| 石台县| 永宁县| 连平县| 四平市| 玛沁县| 陕西省| 孟连| 北安市| 松溪县| 安溪县| 维西| 建昌县| 通化市| 辽源市| 屏东市| 富源县| 青田县| 通化县| 湟源县| 磴口县| 田林县| 西宁市| 岳西县| 尤溪县| 新密市| 沈丘县| 高要市| 博乐市| 博爱县| 荥阳市| 仙居县| 华宁县| 双牌县| 诏安县| 凤城市| 芷江| 丰城市| 奉节县| 泰州市| 宣汉县| 梅州市| 宜兰县| 保定市| 明溪县| 遂宁市| 三亚市| 商河县| 庆云县| 延寿县| 玛纳斯县| 延寿县| 镇原县| 万盛区| 启东市| 清新县| 红河县| 黄龙县| 鞍山市| 绥滨县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 湖口县| 治县。| 潜山县| 明溪县| 嘉定区|