|
BIZCHINA> Review & Analysis
![]() |
|
SOEs property play
(China Daily)
Updated: 2009-07-28 11:49 The craze of State-owned enterprises (SOEs) snapping up land at exorbitant prices in recent weeks is a cause for concern. Besides long-time property players such as Greenland Group and Poly Real Estate, other gigantic SOEs such as Sinochem and China Electronics Corp have emerged as top bidders in recent land auctions in major Chinese cities. This is fueling a real estate bubble after the stagnation in the property market since the global financial crisis broke out in late 2007. Private companies, which won most of the titles in 2007 for "land king" - the top bidder in high-profiled land auction - now feel they are no competitors for SOEs. As a result, they have to change strategy and focus on second- or third-tier cities. Property market analysts observe that the aggressive SOE bids are driven by huge cash injections from the government's 4-trillion-yuan ($586 billion) stimulus package and the nearly 7 trillion yuan of new bank lending in January to June 2009, both of which benefit primarily SOEs.
Of the 27 land plots winning the "land king" title in 2007 in major Chinese cities, 24 remain idle and undeveloped because current housing market prices would not make their projects profitable. Yet the record prices paid by SOEs these days have given them hope as housing prices jumped in cities such as Guangzhou and Shanghai. The growing property market bubble caused by these SOEs has triggered widespread concern for the safety of the taxpayers' money - this should be borne in mind by the SOEs before entering any land auction. Risks aside, the increasing number of SOEs as land kings sends a dangerous signal to the market that housing prices will continue to rise. High housing prices have long been a matter of grave public concern, and this concern is further heightened by the speculative moves of the SOEs.
Though private property developers have long been accused of driving up housing prices, much of the blame now goes to the government and the SOEs. The assertion of the All China Federation of Industry & Commerce a few months ago that government land price constitutes more than half of the cost for property developers has the public pointing fingers at the government. Instead of addressing the concern, sources from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development merely dispute the figure and say that land price is only 23 percent of the cost. The only positive sign is that the central government is taking serious notice of this new bubble - to which the SOEs are also contributing - including at some meetings of the State Council. The SOEs should be cautioned against the use of their funds for this highly speculative role in the property market. (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 涟源市| 常州市| 高邑县| 溆浦县| 临漳县| 望城县| 肥乡县| 习水县| 辽阳县| 根河市| 无棣县| 鄄城县| 大渡口区| 遂平县| 马关县| 天津市| 石首市| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 宁国市| 始兴县| 钟祥市| 鄂托克前旗| 嵩明县| 尼木县| 阿拉善右旗| 钟祥市| 塔城市| 墨脱县| 怀宁县| 台中市| 交口县| 霍林郭勒市| 岳阳县| 岑巩县| 甘洛县| 南丹县| 荥经县| 枣庄市| 溧阳市| 个旧市| 阳春市| 宁安市| 临潭县| 萝北县| 雷波县| 青岛市| 东兴市| 彝良县| 宁安市| 萨嘎县| 拜城县| 安康市| 江源县| 邢台县| 乃东县| 那坡县| 定襄县| 万宁市| 穆棱市| 昌宁县| 澳门| 大城县| 克山县| 瑞丽市| 张家口市| 商水县| 基隆市| 千阳县| 治多县| 麦盖提县| 灵寿县| 斗六市| 彭泽县| 宁蒗| 宜城市| 明星| 牡丹江市| 贵南县| 武山县| 黎城县| 湄潭县| 巴楚县|