男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / View

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

By Mark Williams (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 陕西省| 松潘县| 河曲县| 武强县| 寿阳县| 襄垣县| 彭州市| 乐业县| 北川| 昆明市| 乌恰县| 惠水县| 依安县| 清水河县| 正镶白旗| 迭部县| 新绛县| 炎陵县| 玛曲县| 滦平县| 遂昌县| 翁源县| 孟州市| 台中市| 河北区| 葫芦岛市| 民县| 南汇区| 资阳市| 富裕县| 大悟县| 正定县| 华容县| 宜宾县| 灵石县| 古交市| 讷河市| 嵊州市| 内江市| 南川市| 登封市| 太仓市| 瓮安县| 密山市| 广元市| 高青县| 陇南市| 仁化县| 贡嘎县| 专栏| 满洲里市| 紫阳县| 历史| 嘉黎县| 夹江县| 尤溪县| 新密市| 禹城市| 阿拉尔市| 渭南市| 平舆县| 瓦房店市| 临猗县| 江永县| 青铜峡市| 隆尧县| 和龙市| 湟中县| 商洛市| 长顺县| 房产| 土默特右旗| 天长市| 泌阳县| 寿阳县| 仪陇县| 南雄市| 大兴区| 大庆市| 徐汇区| 东安县| 锡林郭勒盟|