男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Make me your Homepage
left corner left corner
China Daily Website

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23
By Mark Williams (China Daily)

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

(China Daily 12/13/2012 page9)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

 
 
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 三原县| 上杭县| 哈巴河县| 扎鲁特旗| 塘沽区| 邵阳县| 左权县| 九寨沟县| 高雄市| 台湾省| 北辰区| 哈尔滨市| 静安区| 建平县| 苏尼特左旗| 关岭| 信阳市| 德兴市| 天全县| 晋城| 武定县| 南开区| 嘉定区| 五台县| 林州市| 巴中市| 沙洋县| 麻城市| 分宜县| 阜宁县| 繁峙县| 嘉义市| 伊川县| 永和县| 长汀县| 房山区| 鄂州市| 宁晋县| 连云港市| 绥江县| 新晃| 塘沽区| 梨树县| 林甸县| 山阳县| 化隆| 南部县| 新宁县| 闽清县| 临朐县| 樟树市| 通榆县| 津南区| 星子县| 城步| 榆树市| 那坡县| 富川| 连平县| 伊宁市| 金乡县| 拜城县| 五华县| 西华县| 同德县| 永川市| 华宁县| 临武县| 松溪县| 西贡区| 荥经县| 峡江县| 视频| 南川市| 罗源县| 兴义市| 无极县| 登封市| 沙湾县| 昌江| 固原市| 北安市|