男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Industries

The white elephant in the room

By Zheng Yangpeng | China Daily | Updated: 2013-09-05 00:50

Study shows excessive infrastructure investment negatively impacts economy

Whether China's largely State-driven infrastructure construction is excessive is always a topic subjected to vehement debate at home and abroad. A recent study offered a new clue to the answer.

The study, commissioned by the Shanghai-based SIFL Institute and led by two researchers with the Antai College of Economics and Management of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, touched upon the issue by comparing China's infrastructure investment with its private productive capital.

The white elephant in the room

According to experts, it is reasonable for China to adopt an "infrastructure going ahead" strategy in its go-west campaign. The problem, however, is the breakneck infrastructure investment pace has not been followed with industrial investment growth, primarily led by the private sector.[Cai Zengle / for china daily]

The study is built upon an assumption that there is an optimal allocation between the infrastructure investment and private productive capital. Any deviation from the balance leads to efficiency losses, thereby resulting in losses in GDP.

Huang Shaoqing and Shi Hao analyzed China's investment data during 1985 and 2011. In their calculation, infrastructure includes electricity, gas, water, transportation, warehousing and postal, water conservancy, environment and public utilities and information transmission. The remainder is counted as private productive capital.

The study found the largest loss occurred in 1997, when infrastructure investment was severely inadequate, causing losses amounting to 2.58 percent of GDP that year. This means that factor input could have generated more GDP if infrastructure and private productive capital went hand-in-hand.

Since 1998, the government has ramped up infrastructure investment by issuing bonds. The loss because of insufficient infrastructure investment has been gradually alleviated. In 2003, the cost was reduced to 0.64 percent of GDP that year.

The trend, however, has reversed since 2003. From 2003 to 2008, costs resulting from excess infrastructure investment in economically underdeveloped regions and insufficient investment in most developed coastal economies kept rising, reaching 1.31 percent of GDP in 2008.

At the end of 2008, China decided to roll out a large-scale stimulus package to avert the contagion effect of the global financial crisis. In the following two years, much of the credit spree flooded the infrastructure sector.

In other words, the infrastructure spending spree happened at a time when infrastructure in most regions was already over-built. Hence, the ratio of GDP losses has steadily risen from 2008's 1.31 percent all the way up to 2011's 1.85 percent — 872.4 billion yuan ($135.3 billion).

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 甘南县| 同仁县| 姚安县| 孙吴县| 靖江市| 汾阳市| 白水县| 洛宁县| 承德市| 三台县| 前郭尔| 瑞金市| 西乡县| 深州市| 北海市| 象州县| 武夷山市| 永修县| 湖口县| 南漳县| 鹰潭市| 交口县| 高雄市| 淅川县| 潞城市| 灵宝市| 吉木乃县| 两当县| 梅河口市| 中江县| 张家界市| 六枝特区| 天门市| 五常市| 长治市| 五原县| 龙里县| 铜陵市| 宾川县| 长治市| 茂名市| 伽师县| 土默特右旗| 太谷县| 杨浦区| 樟树市| 襄汾县| 太康县| 剑阁县| 黎川县| 安西县| 长沙县| 珲春市| 游戏| 仁化县| 读书| 通河县| 兴安县| 罗山县| 邵阳市| 休宁县| 凤台县| 五台县| 宝应县| 阳谷县| 天全县| 虹口区| 田阳县| 同江市| 兰州市| 邹城市| 青浦区| 横山县| 阿巴嘎旗| 合肥市| 荥阳市| 柘城县| 辽阳县| 夏河县| 图木舒克市| 景德镇市| 婺源县|