男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Companies

BOC weighs legal options against US court ruling

By Li Xiang (China Daily) Updated: 2015-12-03 07:05

BOC weighs legal options against US court ruling

An advertisement for Bank of China in Wuhan, Central China's Hubei province, May 9, 2015. [Photo/IC]

Lender slapped with daily fines of $50,000 for withholding client account information

Bank of China Ltd is seeking to appeal against a United States court order that imposes $50,000 daily fine on it for withholding information, its legal advisers said on Wednesday.

The State-owned lender was held in contempt by a US court for refusing to provide account details of Chinese customers accused of selling counterfeit luxury goods. The US court said the daily fines would be imposed from next Tuesday, unless BOC complies with the subpoena request for client information.

BOC has been involved in the legal dispute that stemmed from a case in 2010. Gucci, the luxury brand of Paris-based Kering SA, sued owners and operators of a Chinese website for trademark infringement, online sales of imitation handbags and other items.

The bank, which is not a defendant in the Gucci case, has claimed that it has been caught in between the conflicts of the legal systems of China and the US.

Jiang Ying, a lawyer at Allen & Overy, the law firm representing BOC, said that the fine is "unfair" for the bank, which is "innocently involved" in the case and it would put the bank in a dilemma of violating Chinese laws if it has to comply with the US laws.

The incident underscored the growing legal disputes facing Chinese financial institutions in the US under the controversial Long-Arm Statue, a legal provision that allows US courts to exercise jurisdiction over foreign entities, provided that the prospective defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the US, legal experts said.

Jiang said that the involved parties should be able to invoke the multilateral Hague Evidence Convention to resolve the dispute. The Hague procedure enables the plaintiff to obtain evidence, including bank account information, under the Chinese legal procedures.

Had Gucci opted to use the Hague Convention, they would have obtained the information they seek long before now, Jiang said.

Gucci also has the option to sue the defendants in China and obtain Chinese court's assistance in obtaining information and freezing accounts.

Jiang said that she is aware of at least three cases where the counsel representing Gucci successfully used Chinese courts to do so in recent years.

While it is hard to guess whether BOC will win its appeal, Jiang said the case will far reaching impact on Chinese companies and all foreign businesses in the US affected by the long-arm jurisdiction.

Shi Jinjuan, a partner of law firm Dacheng Dentons in Shanghai said the Bank of China dispute represents a major legal challenge in information disclosure for Chinese companies. It could also hit future Chinese investments in the US.

"If the court ruling goes against the bank, Chinese companies may become more cautious or even less willing to invest, set up offices or list their shares in the US," she said.

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 新巴尔虎右旗| 云龙县| 信阳市| 大余县| 陇南市| 建德市| 凤阳县| 平安县| 涪陵区| 万载县| 福贡县| 高邮市| 长泰县| 广水市| 吉安县| 湘乡市| 平武县| 甘谷县| 忻城县| 临桂县| 永兴县| 襄樊市| 耿马| 景东| 山阳县| 定陶县| 德钦县| 彩票| 大洼县| 竹溪县| 德阳市| 裕民县| 策勒县| 衡水市| 涞源县| 仁怀市| 黔江区| 台州市| 靖边县| 广德县| 榆林市| 铜陵市| 铜陵市| 美姑县| 蛟河市| 陕西省| 武宁县| 萨迦县| 铁岭县| 邢台县| 密山市| 东海县| 瑞金市| 乌拉特后旗| 宣威市| 碌曲县| 昭觉县| 白河县| 谷城县| 关岭| 嘉鱼县| 阳城县| 周口市| 都安| 太谷县| 曲阜市| 壤塘县| 伊金霍洛旗| 祁东县| 清水县| 东台市| 八宿县| 石阡县| 钦州市| 合山市| 内黄县| 武平县| 闻喜县| 河北省| 义马市| 柏乡县| 湄潭县|