男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

CHINA / Regional

Ad rivals in court over contract dispute
By Cao Li (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-05-25 10:21

Having announced a huge yearly revenue increase just last Friday, Nasdaq-listed Chinese advertising company Focus Media found itself in the spotlight for far less welcome reasons Wednesday, as it appeared in court charged with unfair competition.

In the case's first hearing at Shanghai No 1 Intermediate People's Court, Focus Media Holding Ltd and Shanghai Focus Media Advertising Co Ltd were jointly accused of illegally trying to expand their presence in 13 Hymart supermarkets in Shanghai and Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province.

The case was brought by CGEN Digital Media Network Co Ltd, one of Focus Media's major competitors, which claims Focus approached the 13 stores encouraging them to break their contracts with CGEN.

CGEN is demanding Focus cease all activities in the 13 stores, issue a public apology, and pay more than 13 million yuan (US$1.6 million) compensation.

Specializing in selling advertising space on LCD television screens in large supermarkets, CGEN claims it signed three-year exclusive contracts with 13 Hymart stores 11 in Shanghai and two in Hangzhou in 2004.

Attorney for CGEN Zhong Jinguang told the court yesterday that the company sent letters to the 13 stores in March, 2005, warning them not to breach the contracts by working with any "third party."

A month later CGEN received replies from the Shanghai Kangren Hymart Supermarket Trading Co Ltd which manages the stores, terminating the contracts.

"They accused CGEN of violating Internet law and other problems," Zhong said. "But those were all excuses."

Zhong showed the court a copy of Focus Media's international prospectus published in July, 2005.

In it, Focus says it is in the process of expanding its network into the Hymart chain, adding that, in order to ensure its presence in the stores, it has agreed to compensate the supermarket chain for costs incurred in defending any breach of contract suit brought by CGEN against Hymart.

CGEN successfully sued the 13 Hymart stores late last year, with the court ordering Hymart to pay CGEN 300,000 yuan (US$37,040) in compensation.

Representing Shanghai Focus, Yang Ming accepted Shanghai Focus had signed contracts with two Hymart stores in Hangzhou and installed facilities in 11 Shanghai stores, but said everything had been done in accordance with the law.

As his client's relationship with Focus Media Holding Ltd was purely as a business partner in Shanghai, he added, Shanghai Focus could not be held responsible for Focus Media's behaviour elsewhere.

"The prospectus was published in the United States and it is not proper to judge its validity in China," he said.

The case continues.


 
 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 满洲里市| 佛坪县| 长春市| 英吉沙县| 南召县| 丹凤县| 梓潼县| 左云县| 十堰市| 泾源县| 涞源县| 大理市| 石嘴山市| 洱源县| 纳雍县| 渑池县| 墨玉县| 黎川县| 宁德市| 丁青县| 泽州县| 新野县| 东方市| 文化| 旬阳县| 府谷县| 永兴县| 大悟县| 贡觉县| 榆林市| 昌都县| 沈阳市| 阿图什市| 桓台县| 宜兴市| 岐山县| 龙胜| 七台河市| 玉屏| 汽车| 上思县| 永善县| 大方县| 丽江市| 微博| 楚雄市| 仪陇县| 荆州市| 永川市| 裕民县| 汕尾市| 芷江| 定襄县| 乌兰察布市| 焦作市| 南川市| 泗洪县| 庆元县| 巴青县| 贵港市| 房产| 泾阳县| 苏州市| 福安市| 邳州市| 喜德县| 综艺| 高雄市| 平乐县| 新和县| 女性| 麦盖提县| 清河县| 巨鹿县| 普安县| 云阳县| 象州县| 沙湾县| 开阳县| 扶余县| 锦屏县| 常宁市|