男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Landmark ruling for consumers against airlines

By Xin Dingding (China Daily)
Updated: 2007-04-27 07:48

China Southern Airlines, one of the country's biggest carriers, lost a lawsuit on Wednesday after a court ruled it had failed to notify a customer that his flight might have been overbooked.

The ruling was without precedent in China. Courts have traditionally favored large enterprises and government departments in consumer-initiated lawsuits, even as such disputes have grown increasingly common in recent years.

The passenger, a Beijing resident known only by his surname, Xiao, sued China Southern for not allowing him to board an overbooked flight for which he had bought a ticket.

Xiao had purchased a ticket that had been discounted by 30 percent for flight CZ3112 from Beijing to Guangzhou on July 21, 2006. He paid 1,300 yuan ($168).

However, when he tried to check in, he was not allowed to board. Airline staff told him everyone had boarded the flight and that Xiao's ticket had been bumped by overbooking.

Staff told him that overbooking is an international practice, and that airline companies are allowed to sell 3 percent more tickets than seats available.

China Southern then arranged for Xiao to take the next flight, CZ3100, and upgraded him to a first-class seat. The flight was due to leave Beijing at 10:39 pm, two-and-a-half hours later than the original flight.

In response, Xiao accused the company of obscuring the truth, causing him to be delayed at the airport and violating his rights and interests. He decided to sue the company, demanding a public apology and 2,600 yuan in compensation, or double the cost of the ticket.

The People's Court of Chaoyang District heard the case on Tuesday.

"The defendant did not inform the plaintiff that the ticket sold to him was for an overbooked flight. That is cheating, and consequently the company violated the plaintiff's interests," said the man's lawyer.

The defense said overbooking is an internationally accepted practice aimed at hedging against possible losses.

Generally, airline companies inform passengers when their ticket is in the overbooking category, allowing them to decide whether or not to buy the ticket. China Southern failed to notify Xiao.

The court ruled that China Southern should pay Xiao 1,300 yuan for failing to inform him that he might not be allowed to fly as planned, though it also said the company had not cheated Xiao.

Overbooking is a fairly new concept in China, and few airlines bother to tell passengers about it.

The court sent a letter to the General Administration of Civil Aviation (CAAC) suggesting that it draft regulations on air ticket overbooking.

A CAAC official surnamed Wang told China Daily that the current system lacks rules on the practice.



Top China News  
Today's Top News  
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
主站蜘蛛池模板: 本溪市| 青浦区| 河北省| 武清区| 田林县| 甘孜| 安达市| 宁河县| 祁东县| 福鼎市| 阿拉尔市| 万年县| 凤庆县| 鄂托克前旗| 乐清市| 华坪县| 山丹县| 比如县| 祥云县| 乡城县| 会泽县| 青州市| 台湾省| 光山县| 松阳县| 抚松县| 大竹县| 东丽区| 汝南县| 治县。| 普格县| 六盘水市| 郧西县| 辽中县| 鲜城| 江油市| 宁安市| 扶余县| 伊吾县| 兴业县| 江源县| 麻江县| 南涧| 任丘市| 安康市| 宁波市| 凤山县| 兴安盟| 锡林浩特市| 玉田县| 楚雄市| 台东市| 理塘县| 犍为县| 财经| 丁青县| 岱山县| 留坝县| 阳信县| 汶川县| 太湖县| 安溪县| 新源县| 繁昌县| 方正县| 南漳县| 太谷县| 静安区| 定兴县| 宁夏| 镇雄县| 茌平县| 原平市| 秦皇岛市| 大悟县| 兴化市| 新余市| 扎鲁特旗| 丹东市| 溆浦县| 衡山县| 井研县|