男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Society

Chinese charities struggling to restore trust: report

Xinhua | Updated: 2013-06-01 06:53

BEIJING - After a series of scandals seriously discredited the Red Cross Society of China (RCSC), the country's charity circle is facing "unexpected hardships" in rebuilding trust, a report has found.

The Annual Report on China's Philanthropy Development 2013 said the "Guo Meimei incident" in 2011 exposed multiple problems in the RCSC's management, triggering a credit crisis for the country's charity circle, and that its influence still persisted in 2012.

The report, released on Friday by the social policies research center under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, cited that donations received last year by the RCSC showed a 26-percent decrease from the previous year -- nine percentage points greater than the figure for all charity groups in the country.

The RCSC's reputation took a major hit in 2011, when a young woman calling herself Guo Meimei used social media to claim she managed an organization under the charity and openly flaunted her wealth and extravagant lifestyle.

The scandal triggered public concern about embezzlement within the charity.

Earlier this month, the RCSC suffered fresh criticism when it was found to have diverted donations earmarked for specific uses to other projects without notice.Friday's report cited a survey conducted in March last year on 300 donors whose contributions to the RCSC surpassed 100,000 yuan (16,181 US dollars).

According to the report, only 20 percent of all those questioned replied, and among these donors, 98 percent demanded the RCSC provide feedback on the use of their donations while only 19 percent said they had received such info.

The report noted that the remaining 80 percent of donors had most likely not answered the questionnaires due to their reserved opinions about the future development of the RCSC.

According to the report, the RCSC's reform gestures have provided no immediate relief of public concern while media and netizens have continued to voluntarily supervise the group.

"Under such intense public scrutiny, any sign of doubt or misconduct might drag the group deeper into the predicament of 'exposure' or 'questioning,'" said the report. It urged the group to take initiate in reforming its management and strengthen fund supervision.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 湘阴县| 金昌市| 巧家县| 徐水县| 兴仁县| 宁陕县| 泗水县| 德安县| 肇庆市| 酉阳| 霍山县| 东乡族自治县| 离岛区| 天门市| 镇雄县| 扎鲁特旗| 白朗县| 大关县| 枣庄市| 德清县| 金湖县| 大同市| 辰溪县| 班戈县| 万载县| 社旗县| 西盟| 瑞安市| 阜宁县| 无锡市| 土默特左旗| 衡阳市| 西乡县| 蛟河市| 福州市| 石景山区| 彰化县| 九江县| 忻城县| 祁阳县| 行唐县| 阿尔山市| 永嘉县| 永顺县| 通海县| 西城区| 东乌| 苍梧县| 文昌市| 洪雅县| 安庆市| 扬中市| 杭锦后旗| 连山| 横峰县| 镇宁| 太仆寺旗| 临湘市| 新营市| 翁牛特旗| 新乡县| 炎陵县| 许昌市| 调兵山市| 阿拉善右旗| 五河县| 三河市| 米林县| 桐乡市| 志丹县| 嘉定区| 西宁市| 阳西县| 丁青县| 大城县| 岳阳县| 伊宁市| 阳曲县| 兴安盟| 遵义县| 泽州县| 城市|