男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Home / World

British press fights 'Big Brother' after sources outed

By Agence France-Presse in London | China Daily | Updated: 2014-11-01 07:42

Britain's security services are set to clash with Parliament and the country's powerful press over revelations that police secretly used a controversial law to identify journalists' sources, triggering a wider debate about media freedom in the digital age.

Detectives used a law usually reserved for terror suspects to find out the sources for scoops in The Sun and the Mail on Sunday that led to the downfall of two senior officials.

Other cases have since emerged, although the full scale of the practice is unknown since police do not need to go through a court under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act.

In the case of The Sun, the phone records of political editor Tom Newton Dunn were accessed to find out which officers were behind allegations that Andrew Mitchell, the government's senior representative in Parliament, swore at police.

The newspaper had used the material in a front-page story.

"It was a fairly simple process for them to identify which telephone numbers could be linked to police officers," said Dominic Ponsford from the Press Gazette trade magazine, which is running a "Save Our Sources" campaign.

'Nobody above law'

RIPA was introduced in 2000 to take account of advances in technology and to comply with European law and specifies when authorities can access communications.

But a legal challenge has now been launched in the European Court of Human Rights on behalf of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which claims that the law is being used in a way that contravenes the right to free speech.

"There has been a huge amount of case law at the European Court to say that as part of the right to freedom of expression, the confidentiality of journalist sources has the highest possible protection in law," Ponsford said.

But Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner Mark Rowley insisted the force would continue to use the law.

"Nobody should be above the law, whether it's a member of the public, whether it's a police officer, whether it's a journalist," he told the BBC.

The country's newspapers boast of a tradition of holding institutions to account, but now complain that their huge resources and technical know-how are making it an uneven battleground.

"Journalists must remain arrows and not the target," Seamus Dooley, secretary of Ireland's National Union of Journalists, recently told a conference on journalism in the age of mass surveillance, hosted at The Guardian newspaper's London headquarters.

"The message must be: we are watching Big Brother," he added.

(China Daily 11/01/2014 page11)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 台中市| 宁德市| 巫山县| 武穴市| 镇江市| 建平县| 阜康市| 山丹县| 古丈县| 惠来县| 许昌市| 长海县| 庆云县| 武隆县| 达日县| 襄汾县| 山阴县| 阿尔山市| 富顺县| 炎陵县| 福州市| 北安市| 绿春县| 周宁县| 芦溪县| 乌苏市| 青浦区| 庆城县| 台江县| 沿河| 台中市| 巧家县| 文昌市| 蕲春县| 唐海县| 综艺| 姚安县| 安化县| 浪卡子县| 凤凰县| 五台县| 淮安市| 井研县| 姚安县| 敦煌市| 百色市| 新邵县| 邵阳县| 信阳市| 竹山县| 南陵县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 盱眙县| 宁陵县| 汤阴县| 长阳| 合川市| 观塘区| 平武县| 太康县| 宜宾县| 曲阜市| 台中市| 青铜峡市| 措美县| 福鼎市| 观塘区| 双鸭山市| 福建省| 丁青县| 武穴市| 治县。| 平谷区| 侯马市| 兴安盟| 特克斯县| 木里| 潼南县| 苍梧县| 辰溪县| 循化| 疏附县|