男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
  Home>News Center>China
       
 

People offer pros & cons over Beijing Zoo's removal
(China Daily)
Updated: 2004-06-10 22:30

Talk that the Beijing Zoo, located in downtown Beijing and built almost a century ago, may be moved 35 kilometres away to the outskirts has aroused heated discussion.

"The Beijing Zoo has become a part of Beijing residents' ordinary life, so whether to move it or not is a topic connected to the public interest and must be discussed," said Lei Yi, a researcher with the Institute of Modern History of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

The zoo, one of China's largest with tens of thousands of animals living in it, was built in 1906 in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) as China's first public zoo.

Early this year, Guo Baodong, deputy to the Beijing Municipal People's Congress, and Chen Ruijun, member of the CPPCC (Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference) Beijing Municipal Committee, made a proposal to move the Beijing Zoo from the inner city to the outskirts.

The current location of the zoo can cause cross-infections between humans and animals, pollute the urban environment and cause traffic jams, the proposal said adding that if it is moved to the suburbs where land prices are cheaper, animals will enjoy wider living spaces.

Relevant municipal departments have asked the Beijing Engineering Consulting Company to organize experts for further consultations and debate, said Wang Fenglin, chief economist of the company.

Experts have reached consensus that whether the zoo is moved or not, the vegetation that has existed for a century will not vanish and a good educational base will not be lost, Wang said.

It is unnecessary for the public to worry, Wang said.

But the public is worrying.

Lei Yi questioned the true incentive for the move, saying that the public has the right to know who will use the land where the zoo is currently located and for what purposes.

Chen Yueqin, the mother of a three-year-old child, is a lawyer working at a Beijing-based law firm. She said she usually takes her child to the zoo once or twice a month, but if the zoo is moved to the outskirts, it will be much more difficult for them to go there.

"The removal of the zoo ignores the right of the public to participate in decision making," she said.

If the zoo is moved out of the inner city, its function to educate will be weakened, said Wu Qing, deputy to the Beijing Municipal People's Congress. "So I firmly object to the zoo removal."

It is not convenient for the youngsters to go to the outskirts, so the removal of the zoo will make it more difficult for them to see animals, said Meng Zhaozhen, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering.

 
  Today's Top News     Top China News
 

Eleven Chinese workers killed in Afghan attack

 

   
 

Japan sending chemists to analyze bombs

 

   
 

Pandas gift people with more births

 

   
 

Industries cool down growth

 

   
 

Volkswagen sides with 2008 Games

 

   
 

State bank splits up in pilot reform

 

   
  State bank splits up in pilot reform
   
  Chinese automaker to set up plant in Indonesia
   
  Chinese FM to attend Reagan funeral
   
  Lottery scandal lands six officials in jail
   
  Beijingers rally around Olympic relay
   
  Nation hails new Iraq resolution
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  When will china have direct elections?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 民乐县| 大新县| 县级市| 晋城| 奉贤区| 甘泉县| 平南县| 石家庄市| 敦煌市| 乌鲁木齐县| 广饶县| 吉木萨尔县| 寻甸| 湖南省| 裕民县| 墨江| 麻江县| 平谷区| 西乌| 教育| 酒泉市| 抚州市| 临漳县| 特克斯县| 海口市| 维西| 连云港市| 日土县| 芒康县| 华阴市| 琼结县| 吉首市| 鹿泉市| 张家口市| 游戏| 囊谦县| 双辽市| 新郑市| 上犹县| 左云县| 崇明县| 保靖县| 望城县| 南京市| 聂拉木县| 丹阳市| 新绛县| 广饶县| 宝丰县| 大同县| 大厂| 凤翔县| 黑河市| 耿马| 凤凰县| 兴城市| 北碚区| 恭城| 樟树市| 图片| 河北省| 武义县| 秭归县| 斗六市| 本溪市| 崇明县| 三江| 噶尔县| 诸暨市| 泉州市| 昭苏县| 永春县| 梧州市| 永胜县| 邮箱| 灵台县| 萍乡市| 山东省| 东乡县| 洪雅县| 婺源县| 宿迁市|