男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
  Home>News Center>China
       
 

Exaggerated rally figures aim to fool HK public
(China Daily HK Edition)
Updated: 2004-07-08 09:15

Hong Kong people are annoyed at the brazen way that the July 1 march organizers exaggerated the number of protesters and the motives behind their action, Hong Kong Commercial Daily said in an editorial published Wednesday. Excerpts follow:

Some days have passed since this year's July 1 mass rally, and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) government has started to respond in full swing to the myriad demands expressed by the participants.

Nevertheless, society's scepticism over the attendance figure claimed by the Civil Human Rights Front (CHRF) has persisted.

On the afternoon of July 1, CHRF, as organizer of the rally, amended several times its estimation of the total number of participants, within a short span of two hours, and finally announced excitedly the huge figure of 530,000. This number subsequently became the standard version, widely spread by many local and international media as "fact". But is it really the fact?

Fortunately, there are still academics in Hong Kong who are not willing to believe blindly in others. They want to respect science and rationality, and persevere in the pursuit for truth. These scholars, through on-the-spot observations and serious research, were able to blow the lie sky high and recover the truth.

Among them, researchers of the University of Hong Kong formed a special statistical group to carry out a "precise" calculation; and they concluded that the protest march figure should lie somewhere between 140,000 and 190,000. Some academics used satellite photographs for analysis and came up with the higher number of 260,000.

For their internal use in assisting in the maintenance of public order and other works, the police did their own estimation and placed the figure at less than 200,000.

In fact, there was no significant difference between the results of the various researches and estimations. Only the CHRF dared to ignore the facts and pronounce to the world that the total number of participants at the rally was 530,000. Were they not trying to cheat the world?

We acknowledge that all statistical figures have a certain range of error, but there can never be such a magnitude as in CHRF's estimation. Its exaggeration exercise was undoubtedly an attempt to fool public opinion, the international community as well as Hong Kong people.

CHRF has applied this trick time and again and has never been tired of it. This time it just went too far. One may wonder why the organization was not afraid of offending the public or having its lies exposed, and what its motives and purposes were in risking the tainting of its credibility and integrity.

Judging from the subsequent moves of the "pro-democracy" camp, it is not difficult to find the answer. Once the rally was over, the "democrats" put forward the demand of revoking the decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on the 2007 and 2008 elections. It looks like they were using "public opinion" in Hong Kong to exert pressure on the central government.

As a matter of fact, any observer of the July 1 rally would agree that the participants' demands were wide-ranging and manifold. Only part of the attendees advocated a radical pace of progress for realizing universal suffrage.

Denying the facts, the "democrats" have blown up the attendance on the one hand and simplified public opinion into a request for universal suffrage in 2007 and 2008 on the other.

What they were after was clear as daylight - increasing their political chips and influence and, certainly, gaining advantage in the Legislative Council election in September. When we see the true nature of the rally behind the boisterous slogan chanting, it is not hard to understand the "democrats'" hidden motive in exaggerating the figure.

In fact, the government should listen sincerely to participants' demands and grievances and take follow-up actions no matter how large the crowd. It should do so even if only a few thousand showed up.

Anybody who is frank and aboveboard and committed to doing what is good for Hong Kong does not need to resort to deception over the attendance figure. Since the CHRF has admitted its mistake in head-counting, why does it not step forward to correct its error in front of the world? If it insists on continuing with the fraud, its effort will backfire and it will lose all credibility.



 
  Today's Top News     Top China News
 

Bird flu case rated 'isolated' occurrence

 

   
 

HK's health chief quits over SARS

 

   
 

Japan's sea exploration sparks tension

 

   
 

Power shortage: 6,400 factories to go off-line

 

   
 

Flooding kills 288 in 22 areas across China

 

   
 

Bribery involved in Xi'an lottery fraud

 

   
  Bird flu case rated 'isolated' occurrence
   
  Bribery involved in Xi'an lottery fraud
   
  Ocean-going odyssey remains a treasure
   
  `Care For Girls' gaining momentum
   
  Online games to clean up their action
   
  Sewage fees not job of gov't?
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  When will china have direct elections?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 南川市| 临邑县| 信阳市| 平原县| 清河县| 翁牛特旗| 六枝特区| 湘潭县| 铜川市| 石渠县| 辽阳市| 胶州市| 张家港市| 内乡县| 平利县| 唐山市| 蚌埠市| 韶山市| 长垣县| 鱼台县| 义乌市| 东丰县| 醴陵市| 远安县| 晋江市| 蒲城县| 萝北县| 百色市| 长阳| 郎溪县| 莱阳市| 广饶县| 宜阳县| 宝应县| 武汉市| 巴林左旗| 阿克陶县| 琼海市| 宁德市| 德庆县| 财经| 松滋市| 崇义县| 宝兴县| 扎兰屯市| 绿春县| 仙桃市| 郁南县| 河曲县| 荆州市| 芒康县| 长治市| 衡南县| 北安市| 蒲江县| 建宁县| 峨眉山市| 渑池县| 新民市| 泸西县| 叶城县| 卫辉市| 西峡县| 崇左市| 宜兰市| 平谷区| 常熟市| 祁门县| 曲阳县| 漾濞| 新野县| 延吉市| 阿合奇县| 华阴市| 蓬溪县| 区。| 大田县| 沛县| 左权县| 潜山县| 静安区| 珲春市|