男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
    Advanced Search  
  Opinion>Forum Columnists>T.P.Jackstraw
         
 

No one is saying that Taiwan should belong to the US!
T.P.Jackstraw  Updated: 2004-03-03 09:36

Thanks "abccbc" for contributing that article by Earl Carr from Asia Times Online, it was interesting and had some good points, I think.

However, it sounds to me like the two-stage strategy he proposed is a bit weak, and I don't see how these are Chinese characteristics.

I am having a hard time visualizing what that author meant about "... a public/private partnership ... to organize the private sector ...". What's that? Specifically, does this mean financial support form various Foundations to support US entrepreneurs who become involved in Chinese/Asian corporate ventures?

Also, I am also having a hard time visualizing what the author meant by "... in order to serve as a corporation for public diplomacy ...". Perhaps the author is speaking here about introducing US NGO's into Asia, or of the establishment of joint think-tank participation -- the idea of a 'public diplomacy corporation' seems vague to me.

I would say that the best Chinese characteristic that the US needs in its strategy to improve relationships with Asia, is to calm down and stop being overreactive and so aggressive.

But the first thing the US needs to do, to improve its relations with Asia, is give up on the idea of exporting democrazy by whatever means and force. Not only is this kind of activity contrary to the very tenants of the American foundation in man's inalienable rights, which absolutely include that of self-determination, but it creates an absolute distrust in the intent of the US government and their supporters.

However, this is not an idea the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) has yet to endorse. The US think-tanks, the training facilities of US power brokers, are intent on exporting their form of democracy wherever they can! This is not a genuine interest in peace, but a genuine interest in control, I think!

I note that some Taiwanese will claim Taiwan belongs solely to them, some Mainlanders would say Taiwan belongs solely to China, some might even say the two should share (clearly this is between the two of them no matter what anyone says!), but no one is saying that Taiwan should belong to the US!

TPJ

The above content represents the view of the author only.
 
  Story Tools  
   
Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Advertisement
         

| Home | News | Business | Living in China | Forum | E-Papers |Weather |

|About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Jobs |
Copyright 2005 Chinadaily.com.cn All rights reserved. Registered Number: 20100000002731
主站蜘蛛池模板: 洞口县| 富宁县| 渭源县| 曲水县| 五河县| 秀山| 顺昌县| 崇文区| 津市市| 台中县| 灵川县| 织金县| 桓仁| 沂水县| 醴陵市| 延川县| 临沧市| 榆林市| 镇远县| 东方市| 会同县| 赤壁市| 水城县| 胶南市| 海淀区| 大冶市| 雷州市| 新竹县| 大田县| 华池县| 哈密市| SHOW| 绩溪县| 徐水县| 阜新| 宾阳县| 上饶市| 张掖市| 海原县| 稻城县| 宁城县| 信宜市| 乡宁县| 伊宁县| 涞源县| 建德市| 钟山县| 大名县| 临江市| 山东省| 冀州市| 涿州市| 历史| 固镇县| 寿阳县| 葵青区| 奉贤区| 富阳市| 盐城市| 荣昌县| 武宣县| 鸡泽县| 禹城市| 台前县| 乐东| 晴隆县| 龙里县| 汉寿县| 修水县| 南丹县| 城口县| 江津市| 涟水县| 黄山市| 东乡族自治县| 肇源县| 望都县| 金昌市| 克什克腾旗| 融水| 忻州市| 台山市|