男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Minority shareholders need to be protected

Updated: 2016-08-31 07:53

By Peter Liang(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Reports of Singapore allowing dual share listing on its stock exchange have brought to life an issue that most of us thought had been long buried in Hong Kong.

Neither the Hong Kong stock exchange, which supports dual share listing, nor the watchdog agency, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), which opposes it, has commented on the Lion City's latest move. But insiders have said they expect some stock exchange members to cite Singapore's threat to pressure the local bourse and regulatory authorities to review the controversial idea.

The issue was brought to the forefront a few years back when Chinese mainland e-commerce giant Alibaba sought to secure a listing in Hong Kong. But, the proposed transaction fell through after the SFC made known its objection to amending the Securities Ordinance to accommodate Alibaba's request for a dual share listing. Alibaba later secured a listing on the New York stock exchange.

Hong Kong's seemingly uncompromising position on Alibaba's case was seen by many stock brokers and investment bankers as an opportunity lost. They contended that banning dual share listing has made it difficult, if not impossible, for the city to attract IPOs (initial public offerings) of many mainland tech companies, whose owners need to raise new capital but want to retain full control of their enterprises.

The SFC reiterated its stand against dual share listing when the stock exchange proposed public discussions on the issue. The plan was later withdrawn.

Hong Kong incorporated the ban on dual share listing into the Securities Ordinance to provide an added layer of protection of the rights of minority shareholders. Dual share listing is inherently unfair to minority shareholders and is open to abuse by controlling shareholders. Additional safeguards against potential abuses would greatly increase the costs and workload of the SFC. It's just not worth the trouble.

In addition, the prohibition of class action lawsuits in Hong Kong has made it prohibitively costly and troublesome for minority shareholders themselves to seek redress and compensation from companies in cases of abuse.

Investors who are keen on buying mainland tech companies' shares should be able to do so through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect which is expected to come into play later this year.

 Minority shareholders need to be protected

The Singapore Stock Exchange - a key competitor in the region's financial race. A reported plan by the Lion City's bourse to introduce a dual share listing system has raised eyebrows in Hong Kong. Industry experts say they expect the Hong Kong bourse and securities watchdog to reignite debate on the contentious issue that has long been swept under the carpet. Nicky Loh / Bloomberg

(HK Edition 08/31/2016 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 临潭县| 龙江县| 安阳县| 武山县| 泽库县| 岐山县| 海原县| 宁都县| 奇台县| 通道| 辽宁省| 仪陇县| 广饶县| 永嘉县| 化隆| 青浦区| 陇西县| 田林县| 昌邑市| 左贡县| 浮山县| 石屏县| 利川市| 高陵县| 临沧市| 安顺市| 乾安县| 鲁山县| 长汀县| 灵石县| 岳阳县| 莆田市| 建平县| 堆龙德庆县| 江华| 韶关市| 吉林省| 高雄县| 鸡泽县| 南川市| 乌拉特中旗| 苏尼特左旗| 皋兰县| 山西省| 抚州市| 许昌县| 镇安县| 札达县| 洛扎县| 喜德县| 武邑县| 秀山| 南漳县| 丹阳市| 英超| 尼玛县| 铁岭市| 仙桃市| 克什克腾旗| 准格尔旗| 聂荣县| 海伦市| 邮箱| 法库县| 剑阁县| 蒲江县| 类乌齐县| 罗田县| 洪江市| 高唐县| 莱阳市| 阿克陶县| 乐至县| 南京市| 龙胜| 巩义市| 陇西县| 辽阳市| 乡城县| 太保市| 八宿县| 无锡市|